In "proof-of-unique-human" space my work has been sort of censored, despite being the best. But, it was for example in a "bachelor thesis" last year: https://t.co/hSdPTzx8Ao (it makes typical mistake of thinking "deep fake" is problem in way it thinks - it is not, you still need person behind it. Only hypothetical autonomous AI would be problem that way). The reason is BitNation was controversial, I think. But BitNation was the best in that the best idea came out of it. Also, I was initially somewhat anonymous in promoting the idea, you saw it appear in https://t.co/h38ZzXc2dG but without mentioning me (I reached out to them for that reason so it ended up mentioning me). And, it took me 3 year to finish the design, which I did while publicly discussing the innovation process. Typically, people just regurgitate shit projects like "bright id", "encointer", and "proof-of-humanity", but this is because escape from reality like a fantasy movie can be nice sometimes, whereas https://t.co/0FOGNwMjVA was never fantasy - it is strict coordination theory, with perfect theory and proofs behind it. And since public ledgers are still too slow, and the "community" in "crypto" cannot focus, I prioritized solving multihop payments and finishing my other system (and main project) Resilience, while encouraging people work on people-vote Nakamoto consensus ledgers for traditional countries too (a third reason for the "censorship"). In the meantime, sure discuss the shit projects... get a pat on the shoulder for being able to imitate hearing some blog post mention them as important while you know nothing about what they are - as they have no formal design - nor did whoever wrote the blog post you imitate... So much for "independent verification"... Just semantic regurgitation as if you were an LLM...