Binance Hacker Converts $95.9M in Stolen SOL to Bitcoin: Is It Bullish for BTC?
A hacker linked to Binance's October 2026 security breach began moving approximately $95.9 million in stolen Solana (SOL) toward Bitcoin (BTC), raising questions about the potential impact on both cryptocurrency markets. Blockchain analytics platform Lookonchain identified a transfer of 486,970 SOL worth roughly $46.4 million on November 1, with Relay Protocol reportedly involved in the conversion process. The activity followed Binance's $6.3 billion security incident and came as investigators continued tracing stolen assets across multiple blockchains. Although completed SOL-to-BTC swaps could generate Bitcoin buying demand, the transactions do not establish a bullish outlook for BTC. Their market impact depends on actual execution, liquidity conditions and subsequent movements of the stolen cryptocurrency.
Binance Hacker Begins $95.9 Million SOL-to-Bitcoin Conversion With 486,970 SOL Transfer
The hacker linked to Binance's $6.3 billionsecurity breach began moving stolen Solana (SOL) toward Bitcoin (BTC) on November 1, 2026, adding another development to the movement of assets following the October 29 attack. Blockchain analytics platform Lookonchain reported that the attacker was converting 970,522 SOL, valued at approximately $95.9 million, into Bitcoin through Relay Protocol. During the preceding hour, 486,970 SOL worth approximately $46.4 million had moved from the identified wallet. The activity represents a substantial cross-chain transfer, although the total BTC received from completed swaps remains unverified.
On-Chain Data Confirms Major SOL Transfers as Bitcoin Conversion Continues
Lookonchain's November 1 monitoring showed that the initial movement represented approximately 50.18% of the reported 970,522 SOL holdings, leaving a calculated 483,552 SOL before subsequent transactions. The reported dollar values imply different SOL prices, reflecting potentially separate valuation snapshots rather than confirmed execution prices. Blockchain explorer data subsequently indicated additional changes in the wallet's balance, suggesting that the initial transfer was not necessarily the final movement. However, declining SOL balances alone cannot establish how much Bitcoin was successfully acquired. Confirming completed purchases requires matching the outgoing SOL transactions with settlement records and identifiable BTC receiving addresses.
The wallet activity also has a documented connection to the broader Binance investigation. On October 31, 2026, the FBI identified the TraderTraitor operation as responsible for the theft and published cryptocurrency addresses associated with the attack. The Solana address highlighted in the subsequent monitoring appeared on that list, strengthening the attribution of the reported transfers. The $95.9 million SOL position represented approximately 1.52% of Binance's estimated $6.3 billion loss. Its movement illustrates how attackers can redistribute portions of stolen cryptocurrency across different assets, although the precise destination and final disposition of the converted funds remain under investigation.
Latest Binance Recovery Developments and Upcoming SOL-to-BTC Market Catalysts
The latest official recovery disclosures provide important context for the ongoing transactions. On November 2, 2026, Binance confirmed that the zero-knowledge proof supporting its October 31 proof-of-reserves snapshot had been completed, allowing users to verify at least 1:1 backing for ten major cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin and Solana. The exchange also reported that approximately 95% of the impacted asset value had been replenished using company resources, with the remaining 5% involving less-liquid tokens. On November 3, Binance announced an additional phased withdrawal reopening scheduled to begin at 04:00 UTC, while another reserves snapshot covering additional assets remained planned for November 4. Importantly, replenishing customer assets is different from recovering stolen cryptocurrency directly from the attacker.
The next significant development for the SOL-to-BTC conversion will be verification of additional wallet transfers, completed swaps and Bitcoin received at destination addresses. Further sales of stolen SOL could create selling pressure if executed through markets with limited liquidity, while completed BTC purchases could generate corresponding demand. Neither outcome establishes a sustained price trend without transaction-level execution data and broader market context. Reuters reported on November 2 that Binance customers had withdrawn a net $4.72 billion after the exchange began reopening, highlighting the importance of market confidence alongside on-chain activity. Investors should therefore assess future BTC and SOL price movements against actual trading volumes, market depth, additional stolen-fund transfers and official recovery announcements rather than treating the reported $95.9 million conversion as a confirmed bullish signal for Bitcoin.
How Relay Protocol Facilitates the Stolen SOL-to-BTC Swaps and What On-Chain Data Confirms
Relay Protocol emerged as a significant cross-chain transaction route in the Binance hack investigation after Lookonchain identified activity involving stolen Solana (SOL) and Bitcoin (BTC) on November 1, 2026. The protocol uses cross-chain technology to exchange assets across different blockchain networks through coordinated deposits and destination-chain settlements. Unlike a conventional cryptocurrency exchange, Relay uses liquidity providers known as solvers to fulfil cross-chain transactions. This infrastructure helps explain how stolen SOL could be routed toward Bitcoin without first moving the assets through a centralized trading platform. However, using Relay does not independently confirm that every reported SOL transfer resulted in a completed BTC purchase.
How Relay Protocol Processes Solana-to-Bitcoin Cross-Chain Swaps
Relay Protocol facilitates cross-chain swaps through a system that connects transactions on separate blockchain networks. Its documentation describes a two-stage process involving an initial deposit on the source chain and a corresponding payment on the destination chain. When a transaction begins, the originating cryptocurrency is transferred to a designated receiving address associated with the transaction. A solver then uses available liquidity to fulfil the requested payment on the destination network. For a SOL-to-BTC conversion, this mechanism can connect a Solana deposit with a Bitcoin payment without requiring the two blockchains to communicate directly or share the same transaction format.
The protocol's execution model also helps explain why cross-chain conversion records may contain several distinct transactions rather than one direct SOL-to-BTC exchange. Solvers provide destination-chain liquidity, while separate settlement processes compensate them for successfully completed transactions. The final amount received depends on the quoted exchange rate, network fees, liquidity availability and potential price movements during execution. Large conversions may require multiple transactions because available liquidity and acceptable price impact can vary across routes. Consequently, the $95.9 million reported SOL value should not be interpreted as guaranteed Bitcoin proceeds, particularly without verified settlement amounts.
What Blockchain Evidence Reveals About Relay Transactions and Stolen Fund Movements
Public blockchain records allow investigators to examine transaction timestamps, transferred amounts, receiving addresses and interactions with cross-chain services. On November 1, Lookonchain identified Relay Protocol as the route associated with the Binance hacker's SOL-to-BTC activity. Separately, blockchain analytics firm Elliptic traced the movement of roughly half the stolen SOL holdings to a new address beginning at approximately 09:38 UTC that day. These observations provide evidence of significant wallet activity, but verifying an individual cross-chain conversion requires investigators to connect the original Solana transaction with the corresponding Bitcoin payment. Relay's published transaction-tracking guidance identifies the source-chain deposit and destination-chain fulfillment as separate records that can be examined independently.
Further findings published by Elliptic on November 2 demonstrated that the attacker's Solana activity involved more than straightforward transfers into Bitcoin. Investigators observed some SOL being exchanged for USD Coin (USDC) and subsequently converted back into SOL. They also identified movements through a lending vault, where funds entered from one address and were withdrawn to another. Such activity complicates wallet tracing because asset conversions and intermediary contracts can separate the original deposit from later transactions. The critical evidence remains the amount of BTC ultimately received, the destination addresses and the settlement status of each swap. Until those records are fully reconciled, the observed activity supports an ongoing movement of stolen assets toward Bitcoin rather than confirmation that the entire reported balance was successfully converted.
How the Binance Hacker's SOL-to-BTC Conversion Could Affect Bitcoin Buying Pressure and Solana Prices
The Binance hacker's reported $95.9 million SOL-to-BTC conversion could influence trading activity in both cryptocurrencies, but the transaction does not automatically indicate a bullish outlook for Bitcoin. Converting SOL into BTC may create additional Bitcoin demand while increasing potential selling pressure on Solana. However, the actual market impact depends on completed trade volumes, available liquidity, execution methods and broader investor sentiment. The conversion also occurred during heightened uncertainty following the October 2026 Binance security breach, making it difficult to separate transaction-specific effects from wider cryptocurrency market movements.
Bitcoin Buying Pressure Depends on Executed BTC Purchases
A completed SOL-to-BTC swap requires Bitcoin liquidity to fulfil the transaction, potentially creating buy-side demand when liquidity providers acquire BTC from the market. However, the reported $95.9 million valuation does not necessarily translate into an equivalent amount of immediate Bitcoin purchases. Liquidity providers may use existing inventories, execute transactions in smaller batches or offset their exposure through other trading venues. These mechanisms can distribute the impact across different markets and time periods. Furthermore, purchasing Bitcoin with stolen cryptocurrency represents an exchange of existing assets rather than necessarily introducing new capital into the cryptocurrency market. A sustained bullish effect would require additional evidence of meaningful net BTC demand relative to available liquidity and broader trading activity.
Solana Selling Pressure and Market Liquidity Risks
Solana faces a different potential market effect because converting SOL into Bitcoin can involve selling SOL through available liquidity pools or trading venues. Large transactions may create temporary downward pressure when available buy orders cannot absorb the supply without significant price adjustments. The impact depends on order-book depth, decentralized exchange liquidity, execution speed and whether transactions are divided into smaller amounts. Selling through a shallow liquidity pool can produce substantial slippage, meaning the seller receives less value than prevailing market quotations suggest. However, wallet transfers alone do not prove that SOL was sold at market prices or caused a particular decline. Establishing that relationship would require comparing confirmed swap executions with Solana's trading activity over matching periods.
Bitcoin Price Action and Broader Crypto Market Conditions
Bitcoin's market performance around the conversion provides important context but does not establish a direct relationship with the hacker's activity. On November 2, 2026, CoinDesk reported that BTC was trading near $77,900, approximately 0.4% lower since midnight UTC, after briefly reaching $78,700 during Asian trading. The same report highlighted roughly $643 million in recent U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF outflows, reflecting additional pressure on market sentiment. These developments occurred alongside uncertainty surrounding the Binance breach and wider financial-market conditions. Consequently, any Bitcoin demand associated with the stolen SOL conversions would need to be evaluated against institutional flows, derivatives positioning and overall market liquidity. The available price observations do not establish that the hacker's transactions produced a sustained BTC rally.
Key Market Indicators That Could Shape the BTC and SOL Outlook
The next meaningful market signals will come from verified swap settlements, destination-wallet activity and changes in trading liquidity rather than the original transfer announcement. For Bitcoin, important indicators include the quantity of BTC actually acquired, subsequent transfers to exchanges, spot trading volumes and whether additional purchases occur. For Solana, transaction-level sales data, decentralized exchange liquidity and changes in market depth could help determine whether the conversions are contributing to selling pressure. Broader developments, including Bitcoin ETF flows, institutional trading activity and updates on the Binance investigation, may also influence sentiment. The outlook remains conditional: completed BTC purchases could provide temporary demand, while subsequent sales or weaker market confidence could offset that effect. Neither outcome can be predicted reliably from the reported conversion amount alone.
Binance Hack Recovery, FBI Investigation, and What Comes Next for Bitcoin and the Stolen Funds
The recovery of stolen cryptocurrency from the Binance hack remains a major challenge as investigators follow funds across blockchain networks, decentralized platforms and intermediary wallets. While asset freezes have secured a substantial portion of the stolen holdings, billions of dollars remain in addresses connected to the attack. The next phase of the investigation will depend on identifying additional transactions, preventing stolen assets from being exchanged for conventional currencies and determining whether the remaining funds can be recovered. These developments also carry implications for cryptocurrency market confidence, exchange security and the movement of stolen Bitcoin.
Binance Stolen Funds Recovery and the Difference Between Frozen and Recovered Assets
Blockchain intelligence firm Elliptic reported on November 2, 2026, that approximately $2.85 billion in stolen cryptocurrency had been frozen or seized, while around $3.24 billion remained in addresses connected to the theft. Much of the frozen value consisted of stablecoins because issuers can restrict certain tokens at the contract level. Native cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Solana lack comparable issuer-controlled freezing mechanisms, making recovery more dependent on identifying asset holders and cooperating with custodians or trading platforms. Importantly, frozen assets are not necessarily returned to their rightful owner, and funds identified on-chain are not automatically recoverable. Binance's separate use of corporate reserves and insurance resources to restore customer balances therefore represents financial compensation rather than direct recovery from the attackers.
FBI Investigation Targets Stolen Bitcoin Movements and Crypto Laundering Networks
The FBI has called on cryptocurrency exchanges, decentralized finance services, blockchain infrastructure operators and analytics firms to identify and block transactions associated with the attacker's published addresses. The scale of the tracing challenge became clearer in Elliptic's November 2 investigation, which identified more than 40,000 transactions involving approximately 12,000 wallets across 11 blockchains in less than four days. Researchers also detected around 28 BTC, worth approximately $2.2 million, passing through 18 CoinJoin transactions by 06:02 UTC on November 2. Such transactions combine multiple Bitcoin inputs and outputs, making individual fund flows more difficult to follow. However, these methods do not guarantee that stolen cryptocurrency becomes untraceable. Exchanges and other regulated intermediaries can still identify suspicious deposits, review transaction histories and cooperate with investigators when assets enter their custody.
Upcoming Binance Security Updates and the Outlook for Stolen Bitcoin
The next important developments include Binance's outstanding security investigation, additional asset verification and any confirmed recovery of cryptocurrency still associated with the attacker. Binance has committed to publishing a technical post-incident report explaining the breach and the safeguards introduced afterward, although the final findings had not been established as publicly released by November 3, 2026. The exchange also scheduled another proof-of-reserves snapshot for November 4, with expanded token coverage and a subsequent cryptographic verification process expected to take approximately 40–50 hours. Such disclosures can help customers assess asset backing, but they cannot independently establish that every operational security weakness has been resolved. For Bitcoin, Elliptic's November 2 analysis suggested that only a negligible portion of the stolen holdings had likely been converted into spendable funds. Researchers identified over-the-counter brokers and centralized exchanges as potential future points of conversion, but the timing and scale remain uncertain. The most consequential developments will be verified asset recoveries, further investigative findings and evidence of whether stolen BTC reaches trading venues, rather than assumptions that its movement will produce a particular Bitcoin price trend.
Conclusion
The Binance hacker's reported attempt to convert $95.9 million in stolen Solana into Bitcoin highlights how large cryptocurrency transfers can affect multiple markets while complicating the recovery of stolen assets. Although the initial 486,970 SOL movement is documented, the total Bitcoin received from completed conversions remains unverified. This distinction is essential when assessing whether the activity represents meaningful BTC buying pressure.
The conversion is not inherently bullish for Bitcoin. Its market impact depends on actual transaction execution, liquidity conditions, investor sentiment and whether the resulting BTC is subsequently transferred or sold. As Binance continues restoring services and investigators trace the remaining stolen assets, verified on-chain settlements and official recovery developments will provide more reliable indicators than the reported transfer value alone.
FAQs
Does Converting Stolen SOL Into Bitcoin Increase BTC's Total Supply?
No. Converting Solana into Bitcoin transfers existing BTC between market participants rather than creating new Bitcoin. Bitcoin's maximum supply remains capped at 21 million coins. Large purchases can influence market demand and prices, but they do not change Bitcoin's issuance schedule or total supply limit.
Can Stolen Bitcoin Transactions Be Reversed After a Hack?
Confirmed Bitcoin transactions generally cannot be reversed through the blockchain itself. However, investigators may trace stolen BTC to cryptocurrency exchanges or custodial services that can restrict access to identified funds. Recovery depends on factors such as asset custody, transaction evidence, legal authority and cooperation between relevant organisations.
Why Do Reports Show Different Dollar Values for the Same SOL Transfers?
The US dollar value of a Solana transfer depends on the SOL market price used at the time of calculation. Different blockchain analytics platforms may use separate pricing sources, timestamps or valuation methods. Network fees, trading costs and slippage can also cause completed swap proceeds to differ from the estimated value of the original transfer.
How Can Investors Verify Wallet Addresses Linked to the Binance Hack?
Investors can compare wallet addresses published in official FBI notices with transaction histories displayed by blockchain explorers. These records provide information about token balances, transfers, timestamps and receiving addresses. However, blockchain data does not independently establish the identity of a wallet's controller, and address labels should be assessed against reliable investigative evidence.
Does Binance's Proof of Reserves Guarantee That Customer Assets Are Safe?
No. Proof of Reserves provides evidence that an exchange holds assets backing reported customer balances at a specific snapshot time. It does not guarantee protection against future security breaches, operational failures or losses occurring after the verification. Customers should also consider custody arrangements, security controls, withdrawal access and independently verified financial disclosures.
Can Stolen Cryptocurrency Be Sold Through Centralized Exchanges?
Stolen cryptocurrency may reach centralized exchanges, but trading or withdrawing it can be restricted when suspicious transactions are identified. Exchanges can use blockchain analytics, wallet screening and compliance procedures to detect funds associated with reported thefts. Whether assets can be frozen or recovered depends on the exchange's custody of those assets, applicable laws and the evidence available to investigators.
Disclaimer: This general market information, possibly from third-party, commercial, or sponsored sources, is provided for reference and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice, an offer, solicitation, or guarantee. We disclaim liability for its accuracy, completeness, reliability, and any resulting losses. Investments/trading are risky; past performance doesn’t guarantee future results. Users should research, judge prudently, and take full responsibility. For further details, please consult KuCoin’s Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.