Glamsterdam Upgrade: Technical Evolution — Why It Surpasses Dencun in Significance
2026/03/30 06:03:01
Key Takeaways
-
Strategic Shift: While the Dencun Upgrade (2024) focuses on scaling Layer 2 (L2) via EIP-4844 (Blobs), the Glamsterdam Upgrade (Scheduled for H1 2026) targets the "deep waters" of Layer 1 (L1) architecture to enhance execution efficiency and decentralization.
-
Core Technological Pillars: Glamsterdam introduces Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation (ePBS, EIP-7732) and Block-Level Access Lists (BAL, EIP-7928), integrating external middleware (like MEV-Boost) directly into the protocol.
-
Performance Leap: Through the parallel execution capabilities enabled by BAL, Ethereum’s L1 theoretical throughput is set to increase significantly, moving closer to the long-term goal of 10,000 TPS.
-
Censorship Resistance & Fairness: By implementing ePBS, the network reduces reliance on centralized relays, strengthening Ethereum's inherent censorship resistance and optimizing the distribution of Maximum Extractable Value (MEV).
-
Critical Evaluation: If Dencun built the "intercity highways" (L2 scaling), Glamsterdam reconstructs the "urban power grid and transit hubs" (L1 core engine), ensuring Ethereum’s dominance as the global settlement layer.
Introduction: Reconstructing the Engine of Ethereum
In the historical trajectory of blockchain development, Ethereum has maintained a high frequency of iteration. The Dencun upgrade in March 2024 was undoubtedly a milestone, bringing L2 transaction fees into the "sub-cent era." However, as modular architecture proliferated, it became clear that relying solely on external scaling does not fully resolve the intrinsic pressures on Ethereum as the "Global Settlement Layer."
As we move through 2026, Ethereum developers have shifted their focus to the heart of the execution layer: the Glamsterdam Upgrade. Named following the tradition of merging Consensus Layer naming conventions with "Amsterdam" for the Execution Layer, Glamsterdam is not a simple performance patch. It represents a pivotal leap from "add-on optimization" to "protocol-level enshrinement."
Looking Back at Dencun: The L2 Dividend vs. L1 Stagnation
To understand why Glamsterdam is paramount, one must first analyze the limitations left behind by the Dencun upgrade.
-
The Core of Dencun: Proto-Danksharding (EIP-4844)
The primary achievement of Dencun was the introduction of Blobs (Binary Large Objects). This provided a dedicated, temporary storage space for L2 data, preventing it from competing for the expensive L1 execution Gas space.
-
Outcome: Data publishing costs for major L2s like Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base dropped by over 90%.
-
Side Effect: The execution bottleneck of L1 itself remained unaddressed. During peak periods, the Ethereum mainnet still faces high Gas fees and low concurrency.
-
The Modular Trap and Decentralization Risks
Post-Dencun, Ethereum became heavily reliant on L2 scaling. Simultaneously, the block production mechanism became dependent on external MEV-Boost software and Relays. This "sidecar" mechanism introduced significant centralized relay risks; if a few major relays were to face regulatory pressure or technical failure, the network's censorship resistance would be compromised.
Deep Dive into Glamsterdam: The "Secondary Evolution" of Ethereum L1
The Glamsterdam upgrade is defined as the intersection of "The Surge" and "The Scourge." Its core mission is Enshrinement.
-
Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation (ePBS, EIP-7732)
Currently, Ethereum’s Proposers and Builders are separated via third-party services like Flashbots.
-
The Glamsterdam Shift: Integrating PBS directly into the Ethereum protocol layer.
-
Technical Logic: EIP-7732 introduces new communication steps and validation logic. Builders must submit commitments on-chain, and the protocol automatically handles the auction and payload verification.
-
Significance: This removes the "middleman" (Relays), reduces trust costs for validators, and eliminates potential attack vectors stemming from relay centralization.
-
Block-Level Access Lists (BAL, EIP-7928)
This is Glamsterdam’s "secret weapon" for performance.
-
Traditional Limitation: Ethereum transactions are processed sequentially because the EVM cannot predict which account states a transaction will modify.
-
BAL Mechanism: Requires blocks to pre-declare the accounts and storage keys they will access during construction.
-
Result: Node validators can perform parallel verification of transactions that do not interfere with each other. This is akin to moving from a single-window queue to a multi-window service system, drastically increasing block processing speeds.
-
Gas Repricing and State Pricing Re-evaluation
Glamsterdam includes a series of Gas repricing for various Opcodes.
-
Objective: To ensure Gas consumption more accurately reflects the actual usage of CPU, memory, and bandwidth.
-
Impact: It reduces the cost of simple transfers and low-resource operations while increasing the penalty for operations that contribute to "state bloat." Preliminary estimates suggest an efficiency gain of 20-30% for complex smart contract executions.
Why Glamsterdam Outweighs Dencun in Importance
While Dencun lowered the barrier for entry for average users, Glamsterdam addresses Ethereum’s long-term survival logic.
td {white-space:nowrap;border:0.5pt solid #dee0e3;font-size:10pt;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;vertical-align:middle;word-break:normal;word-wrap:normal;}
| Dimension | Dencun Upgrade (2024) | Glamsterdam Upgrade (2026) |
| Focus | Data Availability (DA) Layer | Execution Layer & Consensus Logic |
| Primary Beneficiary | Rollups/Layer 2 Protocols & Users | L1 Validators, DApp Developers |
| Core Logic | Offloading: Moving L2 data to Blobs | Enhancing: Native Parallelism & ePBS |
| Decentralization Impact | Neutral (Increased relay dependency) | Major Increase (Removed central relays) |
| Technical Complexity | Moderate (External add-on) | Extreme (Base EVM modifications) |
-
From "Road Construction" to "Heart Strengthening"
Dencun was like building wide ring roads (L2) around a city to solve traffic flow, while the city center’s traffic lights (L1 execution) remained outdated. Glamsterdam upgrades the city center's transit hub into an automated, multi-lane intelligent system. Only with a robust L1 can the security and settlement finality of L2s remain unshakable.
-
Solving the Final MEV Challenge
MEV was once the greatest threat to Ethereum's decentralization. Dencun did not touch this issue. Glamsterdam, through ePBS, makes the MEV mechanism transparent and native. This ensures that solo validators can compete fairly for block rewards, preventing the consolidation of power into the hands of a few giants.
-
Competing with High-Performance Chains (e.g., Solana)
Solana’s performance is largely derived from parallel execution. Glamsterdam’s BAL mechanism allows Ethereum to maintain high decentralization standards while achieving L1-level performance competitiveness. This is vital for DeFi protocols, particularly high-frequency trading and Order Book DEXs.
Technical Perspective: The Synergy of EIP-7732 and EIP-7928
In Glamsterdam architecture, these two proposals do not exist in isolation; they form a closed loop.
-
Builder Side: Uses EIP-7928 (BAL) to construct more efficient, compact parallel blocks.
-
Protocol Side: Through the EIP-7732 (ePBS) auction mechanism, builders submit these high-efficiency blocks without needing a trusted relay.
-
Validator Side: Upon receiving the block, validators use multi-core CPUs for parallel verification based on the access lists, significantly reducing Slot Time instability.
Objective Impact on the Crypto Market and Traders
-
Impact on ETH Value
Glamsterdam is not a direct deflationary upgrade like EIP-1559, but the L1 performance boost and Gas pricing optimization are expected to attract high-net-worth DeFi protocols back from other L1s. Increased L1 activity indirectly boosts ETH burn efficiency.
-
Reshaping the Validator Ecosystem
ePBS lowers the technical barrier and dependency on specific network environments (low-latency relay connections). This is a long-term positive for decentralized staking services like Lido and Rocket Pool, as well as individual solo stakers.
Conclusion: The "Coming of Age" of Ethereum
If Dencun was a "declaration" of the modular era, Glamsterdam would be the "proof" of Ethereum returning to technical hegemony. By solving the final decentralization risks in governance and unleashing long-suppressed single-threaded computing power, Ethereum is evolving into a more mature, stable, and sovereign global computer. Glamsterdam ensures that the L1 can handle the internet-level transaction volumes of the next decade.
FAQ for Glamsterdam
Q1: Will Gas fees on L1 drop significantly after Glamsterdam?
A: For L1 users, simple transfers will see a slight decrease due to repricing, but the most noticeable change will be the predictability and stability of transaction confirmation. For L2 users, it provides a more robust settlement layer.
Q2: Why is ePBS considered safer than the current MEV-Boost?
A: MEV-Boost relies on relays. If a relay goes down or censors transactions, validators are often powerless. ePBS writes this logic into Ethereum code, allowing validators to choose builders on-chain, eliminating "middleman" risk and "black-box" censorship.
Q3: How does BAL's "Parallel Execution" differ from Solana's?
A: Solana was built from the ground up for parallelism using engines like SeaLevel. Ethereum is implementing parallelism on the existing EVM framework using "Access Lists" to guide nodes, focusing on speed without breaking backward compatibility for smart contracts.
Q4: Will Glamsterdam affect ETH staking yields?
A: It will optimize the distribution structure. By removing relay fees and opaque processes, solo stakers can theoretically receive more transparent and complete MEV rewards, enhancing their relative competitiveness.
Q5: What is the connection between the next upgrade, Hegotá, and Glamsterdam?
A: Glamsterdam focuses on execution efficiency, while Hegotá (scheduled for late 2026) focuses on state storage (Verkle Trees). Together, they complete the technical vision for Ethereum in 2026.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.
Read More：