Arthur Hayes Says US Treasury’s Bessent Is Copying Yellen’s Liquidity Strategy: Could Bitcoin Rally?
2026/08/30 13:11:00
Arthur Hayes says US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent may be following a liquidity strategy that resembles Janet Yellen’s approach to managing Treasury-market pressure in 2023. His argument connects expanded US Treasury buybacks, long-term bond yields and changes in dollar liquidity with the outlook for Bitcoin. Because BTC has historically reacted strongly to shifts in global financial conditions, Hayes believes what he describes as a Bessent-led version of the Yellen liquidity playbook could provide another supportive backdrop for the cryptocurrency market.
The comparison has gained attention after the Treasury announced that maximum liquidity-support buybacks in selected long-dated sectors would increase from $2 billion to at least $4 billion per operation. However, Treasury buybacks are not the same as Federal Reserve quantitative easing, and the programme does not guarantee that new capital will enter Bitcoin. Whether BTC can rally further will depend on how the operations are funded, how bond and currency markets respond, and whether institutional, spot and on-chain demand remain strong enough to sustain the move.
Why Arthur Hayes Says Bessent Is Following Yellen’s Liquidity Playbook
Arthur Hayes argues that US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is responding to pressure in the government bond market with a strategy that resembles Janet Yellen’s 2023 liquidity playbook. The comparison centres on how Treasury debt management can influence dollar liquidity, long-term borrowing costs and investor appetite for assets such as Bitcoin. However, this remains Hayes’s interpretation rather than an official Treasury policy to support cryptocurrency prices, and the current strategy is not an exact repeat of the measures used under Yellen.
-
Why Rising Treasury Yields Are Increasing Pressure on Bessent
Long-term Treasury yields affect financing conditions throughout the US economy. The 10-year yield influences mortgage rates, corporate bonds and consumer credit, while the 30-year yield reflects longer-term expectations for inflation, federal borrowing and demand for government debt. Hayes believes a 10-year yield approaching 5% could place significant pressure on policymakers because higher borrowing costs can weaken economic activity and increase the government’s interest expenses. During the latest bond-market sell-off, it was the 30-year yield that moved above 5.3%, while the 10-year yield remained below Hayes’s closely watched 5% threshold.
Against this backdrop, the Treasury announced that maximum liquidity-support buybacks in the 10-to-20-year and 20-to-30-year sectors would rise from $2 billion to at least $4 billion per operation. Hayes interprets the decision as evidence that Bessent is prepared to use Treasury debt-management tools when rising yields threaten broader financial conditions. Nevertheless, the initial Bitcoin rally followed the announcement before the enlarged operations had begun, meaning investors were responding primarily to expectations about future policy rather than liquidity already entering the market.
Important details about the expanded buybacks include:
-
The increase applies to selected longer-dated securities rather than the entire Treasury yield curve.
-
Treasury says the operations are intended to improve liquidity and price discovery in older, less-liquid bonds; they may also ease dealer balance-sheet constraints.
-
Treasury buybacks do not reduce the federal budget deficit, and regular auctions of new long-term debt are expected to continue.
-
How Yellen’s 2023 Bill Strategy Shifted Dollar Liquidity
Hayes’s comparison begins with Yellen’s decision to finance more government borrowing through short-term Treasury bills instead of relying as heavily on longer-duration notes and bonds. The increased supply of higher-yielding bills gave money-market funds an attractive alternative to the Federal Reserve’s Overnight Reverse Repurchase facility, or ON RRP. As those funds moved into Treasury bills, the reverse-repo balance declined substantially from approximately $2.6 trillion at the end of 2022.
Hayes describes this movement as a large release of dollar liquidity. More precisely, cash moved from the ON RRP facility into Treasury bills, allowing additional government borrowing to be absorbed with less direct pressure on bank reserves. Bitcoin and the Nasdaq 100 rose during the broader period in which ON RRP balances declined, even though the Federal Reserve maintained high policy rates and continued reducing parts of its balance sheet. That historical relationship supports Hayes’s argument that Treasury issuance decisions can influence asset prices independently of interest-rate cuts. However, the decline in ON RRP balances was not the only reason Bitcoin recovered. Improving crypto sentiment, expectations surrounding US spot Bitcoin ETFs and the 2024 halving also affected demand, making it difficult to attribute the entire rally to one liquidity measure.
-
Where Bessent’s Strategy Resembles—and Differs From—Yellen’s Playbook
The main similarity is that both strategies use the composition of government debt to influence financial conditions without relying immediately on conventional Federal Reserve easing. Yellen increased short-term bill issuance, while Bessent is expanding purchases of older, longer-dated securities. Bessent could potentially fund larger buybacks through additional bill issuance or a drawdown of the Treasury General Account. Either approach could change the mix of cash-like and long-duration assets held by investors, although the effect on banking-system reserves would depend on how the operations are financed.
The differences are equally important. Treasury buybacks are not equivalent to quantitative easing because the Treasury cannot create new money and must use existing cash or borrow the required funds. The large reverse-repo balance that supported the 2023 transition has also been almost completely exhausted, limiting the possibility of another multitrillion-dollar shift through the same channel. Hayes therefore expects further buyback increases or other liquidity measures if bond-market pressure persists, but whether this supports another Bitcoin rally will depend on actual implementation rather than announcements alone.
Investors evaluating the Arthur Hayes Bitcoin liquidity thesis can monitor several new signals:
-
Whether the Treasury accepts substantially larger purchase amounts once the expanded operations begin.
-
Whether buybacks are financed through new Treasury bills or a meaningful TGA drawdown, as the two options can affect market liquidity differently.
-
Whether 10-year and 30-year yields remain lower after operations rather than quickly reversing their initial decline.
-
Whether Bitcoin ETF inflows, spot demand and trading volume remain strong enough to support crypto-specific momentum.
How Treasury Buybacks and Rising Dollar Liquidity Could Affect Bitcoin
Treasury buybacks do not send capital directly into Bitcoin. Their potential influence moves through government cash balances, bank reserves, bond yields, the US dollar and investor risk appetite. The outcome therefore depends on how the purchases are financed and whether improved financial conditions translate into genuine demand for BTC.
How Buyback Funding Determines the Liquidity Impact
If the Treasury were to finance buybacks by drawing money from the Treasury General Account, settlement payments would move funds from the government’s Federal Reserve account into the private banking system. This could temporarily increase bank reserves and deposits, giving financial institutions and investors more accessible cash. Some bondholders might reinvest those proceeds in newly issued government securities, while others could allocate capital to equities, gold, Bitcoin or other risk assets. The scale of any crypto-market benefit would depend on how much cash was released and where investors chose to place it; the Treasury has not committed the TGA to a specific buyback-funding amount.
The effect may be different if the Treasury finances its purchases by issuing new bills. In that case, the transaction mainly replaces older, longer-duration debt with shorter-term securities rather than creating a lasting increase in the money supply. Short-term bills can still improve market flexibility because money-market funds and other institutions generally treat them as highly liquid assets. However, later efforts to rebuild the Treasury’s cash balance could withdraw reserves from the banking system, meaning any liquidity benefit should be assessed across the complete funding cycle rather than from the initial buyback alone.
Why Lower Real Yields and a Softer Dollar Could Support Bitcoin
Bitcoin does not pay interest, so its relative appeal can improve when inflation-adjusted Treasury returns decline. If buybacks support bond prices and reduce long-term yields without reigniting inflation concerns, investors may become more willing to hold scarce or higher-risk assets. A weaker US dollar could provide an additional tailwind by easing global financial conditions, although neither lower yields nor a softer dollar would guarantee that capital flows into cryptocurrency.
Important indicators for investors to monitor include:
-
Real Treasury yields: Falling inflation-adjusted yields reduce the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets such as Bitcoin and gold.
-
US Dollar Index: Sustained dollar weakness can improve international liquidity and reduce pressure on dollar-funded borrowers.
-
Federal Reserve policy: A restrictive policy stance could offset the supportive effects of Treasury operations.
-
Inflation expectations: Rising inflation premiums could push long-term yields higher even if buybacks improve bond-market trading.
ETF Inflows and Spot Demand Will Decide Whether Liquidity Reaches Bitcoin
A supportive macroeconomic environment can create favourable conditions for Bitcoin, but it cannot replace direct buying. US spot Bitcoin ETFs provide one of the clearest channels through which institutional liquidity can become actual BTC demand. Continued net inflows, stronger spot-market volume and broader accumulation would offer more convincing evidence of a sustainable liquidity-driven move than a short rally following a Treasury announcement. If institutional participation weakens, Bitcoin may struggle to retain gains even when bond yields and the dollar move in a supportive direction.
The mechanics of crypto futures trading must also be considered. Short liquidations can accelerate an initial price increase, but a rally driven mainly by forced position closures may lose momentum once the liquidation pressure ends. Excessive futures leverage, rapidly rising funding rates and crowded bullish positioning can also make Bitcoin more vulnerable to a reversal. A healthier outlook would combine consistent ETF inflows, sustained spot buying and moderate leverage, showing that improved dollar liquidity is being converted into durable crypto demand rather than temporary speculation.
Can Bitcoin Rally Further? Key Catalysts, Market Signals and Risks
Bitcoin’s recent advance has strengthened market confidence, but a strong reaction to liquidity expectations does not automatically confirm a lasting bull market. The next phase of the Bitcoin price outlook will depend on whether BTC can preserve its technical recovery, attract new capital and withstand profit-taking after its sharp weekly gain. Arthur Hayes’s liquidity thesis provides one possible macroeconomic catalyst, but investors should also examine market structure, on-chain behaviour and crypto-specific developments before concluding that another major rally has begun.
-
Crypto-Specific Catalysts Could Extend the Bitcoin Rally
Further gains would become more sustainable if improving macroeconomic conditions were accompanied by stronger adoption within the cryptocurrency market. Additional corporate Bitcoin purchases, broader access to regulated custody services, the expansion of real-world assets (RWA) bridging traditional yields with blockchain liquidity, and constructive progress on US digital asset legislation could bring new participants into the market. An expansion in stablecoin supply would also be relevant because stablecoins often represent capital that can be deployed rapidly across crypto markets. These developments would not guarantee higher Bitcoin prices, but together they could broaden demand beyond traders reacting to Treasury headlines and strengthen the fundamental case for a longer recovery.
-
Weekly Price Structure Will Test the Strength of Bitcoin’s Breakout
Bitcoin’s recent weekly increase of approximately 23.6% created strong momentum, while a close above the closely watched $76,000 area improved the short-term technical picture. The more important test is whether BTC can remain above its breakout zone during periods of weaker sentiment and establish a higher low rather than quickly returning to its previous trading range. Several consecutive weekly closes above former resistance, supported by healthy spot volume, would provide stronger confirmation than a single rapid advance. By contrast, repeated rejection at higher levels or a weekly close back below the breakout area could indicate that the rally moved faster than underlying demand justified.
-
On-Chain Activity Can Reveal Accumulation or Profit-Taking
On-chain data can help investors determine whether the Bitcoin rally is attracting fresh capital or allowing existing holders to sell into strength. Rising realised capitalisation can be consistent with capital entering at higher valuations, although it is not proof of new investment by itself, while persistent transfers from long-term holders to exchanges could signal growing profit-taking pressure. Exchange net flows, miner balances and the share of BTC supply held for extended periods can also provide useful context, although no single indicator should be treated as a definitive trading signal. A healthier continuation would generally combine rising network value with controlled holder distribution rather than a sudden increase in coins moving towards exchanges.
-
Key Risks That Could Interrupt Bitcoin’s Recovery
Bitcoin remains a volatile asset, and the current rally may face several challenges even if Treasury policy becomes more supportive. Some investors may already have priced future liquidity measures into the market, creating the possibility of a “buy the rumour, sell the news” reaction when the expanded operations begin. The Arthur Hayes Bitcoin prediction should therefore be assessed as a scenario rather than a guaranteed market outcome.
Important risks include:
-
Profit-taking after the sharp advance: Investors who accumulated BTC at lower prices may use the recovery to realise gains, creating additional supply near important resistance levels.
-
Weak participation outside Bitcoin: Broader real-time crypto market data may reveal a rally concentrated in BTC, which could indicate that investors remain cautious rather than fully committed to crypto risk.
-
A broader risk-asset correction: Bitcoin can decline alongside technology shares and other speculative assets during sudden economic, geopolitical or credit-market stress.
-
Regulatory or operational setbacks: Delays in digital-asset legislation, restrictions on institutional access or a major industry security failure could weaken sentiment.
-
Policy expectations exceeding actual results: If announced Treasury measures have a smaller market impact than investors expect, part of the liquidity-driven rally could reverse.
Bitcoin could rally further, but the strongest confirmation would come from several signals appearing together: durable weekly price acceptance, expanding on-chain capital, broader market participation and continued crypto adoption. If these conditions fail to develop, the recent move may remain a powerful recovery rather than the beginning of a sustained new Bitcoin bull market.
Conclusion
Arthur Hayes’s comparison between Scott Bessent and Janet Yellen offers a useful framework for understanding why Treasury debt management has become relevant to the Bitcoin market. Expanded long-duration buybacks could improve Treasury-market liquidity, influence bond yields and temporarily alter the supply of cash-like assets available to investors. If those changes ease financial conditions and coincide with stronger crypto demand, they could provide a supportive environment for Bitcoin. However, the strategy is neither identical to Yellen’s 2023 approach nor equivalent to direct monetary easing by the Federal Reserve.
The outlook therefore depends on execution rather than the announcement alone. Investors should watch the accepted size and funding of Treasury buybacks, changes in official liquidity measures, Bitcoin’s weekly market structure and evidence of sustained institutional and on-chain demand. Hayes’s thesis may help explain why BTC reacted positively to the policy signal, but a further Bitcoin rally remains possible rather than certain, particularly if actual liquidity growth falls short of market expectations or broader risk conditions deteriorate.
FAQs
What Did Arthur Hayes Actually Predict About Bitcoin?
Arthur Hayes argued that Scott Bessent’s approach to Treasury-market pressure could create liquidity conditions supportive of Bitcoin, similar in broad direction to Janet Yellen’s 2023 strategy. He presented Bitcoin as a sensitive indicator of changing global liquidity, but he did not guarantee a rally or establish a precise price target and deadline.
Did Arthur Hayes Predict That Bitcoin Would Reach $224,000?
No. The $224,000 Bitcoin target circulated by some media outlets was a third-party calculation based on applying a previous cycle’s return to current prices. Hayes did not state that BTC would reach $224,000 in his original essay, so the figure should not be presented as his official forecast.
When Will the Expanded US Treasury Buybacks Begin?
The enlarged long-duration buyback limits are scheduled to take effect on September 9, 2026, with the first larger operation expected on September 10. The announced schedule runs through early November, but investors should check the Treasury’s official buyback calendar and operation results for any changes and the actual amounts accepted.
How Large Are the Treasury Buybacks Compared With Total US Debt?
The maximum value of scheduled buybacks for the relevant quarter was estimated at approximately $83 billion, including at least $14 billion of additional capacity. That remains small compared with federal debt of roughly $40 trillion, so the programme’s significance lies more in improving bond-market liquidity, changing debt composition and influencing expectations than in its size relative to total government borrowing.
Do Treasury Buybacks Reduce the US National Debt?
Treasury buybacks do not normally produce a lasting reduction in federal debt because the government can issue new securities to replace the bonds it repurchases. The operations may retire older or less-liquid securities and replace them with newer bills, notes or bonds, but they do not eliminate the budget deficit or the government’s underlying financing requirements.
KuCoin Offers A More Stable Option in A Volatile Market
If you worry about the frequent ups and downs in the market, and pursue a more stable option to earn money passively, KuCoin is the right place to come:
Simple Earn: Deposit and withdraw tokens anytime, earning stable returns.
Kucoin Earn: Earn stable profits with professional asset management.
Hold to Earn: Earn rewards by holding assets in Funding, Trading, Margin, Futures, Mining, and Unified Accounts.
Staking: Unlock the earning potential of on-chain assets.
Advanced Investments: Advanced Investments offer a variety of structured products to help your money grow in any market.
Shark Fin: Principal Protection and Guaranteed Gains
Dual Investment: Buy low and sell high with transparent return calculations.
Snowball: High yields, with price protection.
Discount Buy: Buy crypto at discount prices.
KCS Loyalty: Level up to enjoy exclusive perks by staking ≥ 1 KCS.
KuCoin Wealth: Discover future value and begin your smart investing journey.
KCS Benefits: Hold and stake KCS to access benefits across the platform.
KCS Staking 2.0: Participate in KCS on-chain governance to earn yield.

Disclaimer
The information provided on this page may originate from third-party sources and does not necessarily represent the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is intended solely for general informational purposes and should not be considered financial, investment, or professional advice. KuCoin does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information, and is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from its use. Investing in digital assets carries inherent risks. Please carefully evaluate your risk tolerance and financial situation before making any investment decisions. For further details, please consult KuCoin’s Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.
