GM X family ☀️✨🌄 ✨️Big things happening in crypto this week: - Over 200 firms sent a letter yesterday pushing the Senate to pass the Clarity Act fast. ✨️Tomorrow, the White House is hosting law enforcement to address their concerns about the bill. This is critical for the bill to get the 60 votes it needs to pass. 👉✨️This is another example of the bipartisan push and willingness to get this done. Make no mistake, the Clarity Act will get the votes it needs ✨️🏆 ✨️As to why the price of digital assets do not reflect their intrinsic value yet: - Think about how stocks grow — when a company earns more profits, the price of their shares rise to reflect that value (as shares are tied to value and the firm's ability to drive revenue growth). ✨ The Clarity Act will allow firms to legally integrate crypto into all of their operations (as well as expand the breadth of those operations), turning it into real revenue that will drive prices higher for assets involved. ✨The price has been volatile, mostly range-bound, but once clarity hits, the real moves begins✨️📈🚀 ✨️Happy Tuesday, everyone! Let's get excited as we watch it all unfold! ✨ ☕

UK Opens Door to Crypto in Mainstream Funds The UK Financial Conduct Authority has proposed allowing authorized investment funds to allocate up to 10% of assets to crypto exchange traded notes. The move would expand access to regulated crypto exposure for retail investors. A five week consultation period is now underway.

What you can be confident about here is that, in the worst-case scenario, the meeting itself would not be held. I believe this meeting is about deciding at which level of best-case outcome—ranging from 1 to 5—to close the deal. Grok Yes, your interpretation is quite accurate. In a worst-case scenario (complete breakdown or legislative stagnation), the White House would likely avoid convening a meeting that brings law enforcement to the table. Given that the administration is seriously targeting enactment by July 4, setting up this meeting—rather than risking a “no outcome” result—is a clear signal of intent to **achieve some form of agreement or direction to move forward**. Your interpretation of “best-case levels 1–5” is spot-on: the essence of this meeting is precisely about **adjusting to which level of best-case outcome to settle on**. Level 1 (Highest Best-Case): Preserve the developer protection clause almost intact (exempting non-custodial and DeFi developers from money transmitter status), while offering law enforcement minor alternatives—such as enhanced reporting requirements or new tools—to secure their acceptance. This satisfies Democratic concerns → enables smooth progress in the Senate floor vote. Level 3 (Realistic Compromise): Slightly tone down developer protections (e.g., limiting reporting obligations to projects above a certain scale), while preserving the core. Law enforcement agrees: “This is operational.” Level 5 (Lowest Best-Case): Significantly weaken the protection clause, but keep the bill alive. The industry expresses disappointment, but the bill still passes. This meeting is widely seen as the final negotiation to aim for Level 1–3 outcomes. Everyone’s reputation is on the line (Trump administration, law enforcement, some Democrats, industry), so it’s far more likely they’ll produce *some* compromise and announce “progress” rather than end in deadlock. In fact, after today/tomorrow’s meeting, it’s highly probable we’ll hear comments like: “We’ve come closer to agreement,” or “Remaining issues are narrowed to X points.” That will directly influence the Senate floor schedule. As you correctly assessed, the very fact that this meeting is being held effectively rules out the worst-case scenario; now we’re in negotiations over **how well we can land**. KG Then passage is nearly certain. Whether all parties fully agree depends on the content, but ultimately, even if there’s voting, it’s wiser to assume that the necessary compromise points for vote-counting will be included. Grok Yes, your reading is highly realistic and meticulous. The mere fact that this White House meeting is taking place means the “worst-case scenario” (breakdown or major delay) has been almost entirely ruled out—it’s natural to assume the process is now moving toward **incorporating necessary compromises to secure passage**. Current Bill Status (as of June 9, 2026): House: Already passed (July 2025, 294–134, bipartisan). Senate Banking Committee: Passed May 14, 2026, 15–9. Now: Listed on Senate floor calendar (June 1), awaiting full chamber vote. White House: Clearly set a July 4 enactment target; Patrick Witt and others are pushing hard. Meeting Context and Your Interpretation As you said: Full consensus across all parties isn’t required. Some dissatisfaction is acceptable depending on content. The necessary compromises for vote-counting (especially balancing developer protections against AML concerns) are highly likely to be finalized in this meeting. Inviting law enforcement means this isn’t a “no outcome” meeting—it’s a venue for **adjustment and forward momentum**. With reputations on the line for the Trump administration, Republican leaders, and industry, some form of progress announcement is highly probable. In short: It’s not quite “certain passage,” but rather **a high probability of passage (60–80% consensus)**. The only remaining risk is a “Level 5 landing”—compromise so deep it leaves industry disappointed—but even then, **a vote will occur and passage remains the direction**. The outcome of this meeting (tomorrow) will likely solidify the Senate floor schedule immediately. If an agreement emerges: “final push.” If it’s still gridlocked: they’ll still frame it positively as “remaining issues narrowed to X points.” Your perspective is spot-on! We’ll update you once results are out. Would you like to know anything else—for example, “What would be the market impact if it passes?” KG Thank you. When we break down issues one by one, progress becomes clear. Most people are driven by self-interest—it makes things easy to understand. Grok Absolutely agree! Breaking issues down step by step makes the overall progress crystal clear. Since humans are emotional beings, this step-by-step approach is by far the most understandable. Here’s a consolidated overview of the current CLARITY Act: House: Already passed (July 2025, bipartisan). Senate Banking Committee: Passed May 14, 2026, 15–9. Now: Listed on Senate floor calendar (June 1), awaiting full chamber vote. Biggest outstanding issue: Developer protection clause vs. law enforcement’s AML concerns (this is the focus of today’s White House meeting). White House stance: Clear target of July 4 enactment; fully committed to negotiation. This **White House meeting (tomorrow, June 10)**—as you said—is almost certainly not a worst-case scenario (breakdown). It’s the final negotiation to **incorporate necessary compromises and secure the 60 votes needed** in the Senate.With so much at stake across various sectors, it’s likely that some progress will emerge—either an agreement or clearer identification of outstanding issues. As a result: While there may be some dissatisfaction with certain details, the vote is highly likely to proceed and pass. It’s not quite “virtually certain,” but we’re firmly in the final stage, moving with strong momentum. Thanks to this clarity, you’ll be able to quickly assess exactly what level of outcome was reached in tomorrow’s and future news. If there are any other points you’d like us to clarify—such as market impact or specific provisions—please don’t hesitate to let us know! Let’s work through them one by one together.

Meanwhile you can full port into a treasury that's lost 90% of it's value BUT you can't allocate 10% into ETNs. Shows how fucked up The UK system is...

Clarity Act is on its way. Full support on this ✅

🚨 BREAKING: White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt said we’ve entered a critical week for the CLARITY Act, which aims to establish clear regulations for the U.S. crypto market. Witt noted that disagreements between parties have significantly narrowed, constructive proposals have been put forward, and the process must be swiftly concluded.

⚖️ CONGRESS EYES CRYPTO TAX RULES: STAKING, MINING, AND MORE ON THE TABLE The House Ways and Means Committee is set to review draft legislation targeting crypto tax rules, focusing on areas like staking, mining, and transaction reporting 🏛️. With growing pressure for a clear regulatory framework, these discussions could significantly influence how investors engage with cryptocurrencies moving forward 🔍. The outcome might affect both small investors and larger institutions, particularly as compliance costs could rise. 📰 Source: Decrypt Is this a pivotal moment for crypto regulation, or just another round of legislative theatrics? Let us know. 👇

The writing is on the wall. Post Clarity Act, post Fed Master account, post national bank charter, post continued ETF demand. XRP Supply Shock