𝗦&𝗣 𝟱𝟬𝟬’𝘀 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗗𝗮𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 – 𝗙𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝗦𝗲𝗹𝗹‑𝗢𝗳𝗳 𝗦𝗽𝗶𝗹𝗹𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗠𝗼𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝗗𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗲 🔹 S&P 500 fell 2.64% to 7,383.74, its sharpest decline of 2026. 🔹 Nasdaq Composite plunged 4.18%, while the Dow Jones lost 1.35%. 🔹 VIX surged nearly 40%, signaling heightened fear. 𝗗𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀 Jobs Report – +172K payrolls vs ~85K expected; unemployment steady at 4.3%. Strong labor data reduced hopes for Fed rate cuts, pressuring high‑valuation tech. 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁 𝗦𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 Weekend debate split: ▸ Bears warn of further downside. ▸ Bulls cite historical rebounds after similar Friday sell‑offs. 📉 The sharp move highlights how quickly macro surprises can shift equity sentiment, especially in tech‑heavy indices. #SP500 #Nasdaq #DowJones #JobsReport #Volatility #MarketUpdate

𝗧𝗼𝗽 𝟭𝟬 𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗦𝗧 𝗗𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗡𝗔𝗦𝗗𝗔𝗤 𝟭𝟬𝟬 𝗛𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 March 13, 2020 — -12.3% 🔴 October 19, 1987 — -11.4% 🔴 April 14, 2020 — -9.7% 🔴 March 12, 2020 — -9.4% 🔴 September 29, 2008 — -9.1% 🔴 October 26, 1987 — -9.0% 🔴 October 20, 1987 — -9.0% 🔴 December 1, 2008 — -9.0% 🔴 August 31, 1998 — -8.6% 🔴 October 15, 2008 — -8.5% 🔴 📉 These dates highlight the most violent sell‑offs in Nasdaq 100 history, spanning the 1987 crash, 2008 financial crisis, and 2020 pandemic shock, underscoring how quickly risk can materialize in high‑growth markets. #Nasdaq100 #MarketHistory #WorstDays #TechStocks

The Fed will meet this week to decide on interest rates. This will be the first meeting under new Chair Kevin Warsh. According to the event schedule, a press conference will still be held after the meeting. ⏰ 12:00 PM Wednesday Pacific / 1:00 AM Thursday Vietnam

The probability of the Federal Reserve holding rates steady in June is currently at 95.4%. The probability of the Federal Reserve holding rates steady in June is currently at 95.4%. BlockBeats report, June 7: According to CME's "FedWatch" data, the probability of the Federal Reserve maintaining rates unchanged in June is now 95.4%, while the probability of a 25-basis-point rate cut stands at 4.6%. [Original link] Next, monitor three key factors: whether capital continues to flow in, whether on-chain trading volume and open interest continue to expand, and whether the project team or regulators provide any new confirmation. A single news item only indicates heightened sentiment; it is the subsequent data that will determine whether this momentum solidifies into a lasting trend. Risks must also be acknowledged: if trading activity and capital inflows fail to keep pace, the market may quickly absorb this as a one-time pulse. #OnChainData #Regulation #Blockchain #CryptoMarket #Crypto

At age 50, Munger’s investments were halved, and it took him 16 years to break even. You may admire Munger’s wisdom and wealth, but you might not know that at 50, he faced the darkest low point of his life. And it took him a full 16 years to climb out of that abyss. Before the 1973 market crash, Munger had achieved an astonishing annualized return of 22%. Then the U.S. stock market collapsed, and his partnership lost 53%. Because he had used leverage, his personal net worth declined even further. One cold winter night that year, Munger drove home looking exhausted. As he passed a gas station, he saw a middle-aged man in a greasy uniform, weary but calm, refueling his car. In that moment, Munger plunged into a profound psychological crisis. He rolled down his window and stared at the man, asking himself: “If I had just stayed a humble lawyer all along and never touched investing, wouldn’t my life be better than this?” In that instant, Munger came dangerously close to giving up. In 1975, the market rebounded strongly, and Munger’s partnership surged 73.2%. But after a 53% loss, a gain of 113% is needed just to break even. So even with that 73.2% rally, his assets recovered only to 80% of their original value—and his personal wealth was still far from breakeven. Munger made a painful decision: admit defeat and wind down the partnership. He told himself: I will start over—but I will not abandon investing, because I believe I can do better. For the next 16 years, Munger slowly rebuilt his wealth until he finally returned to his pre-crash peak. Of course, using the term “break even” is misleading. Once someone desperately seeks to “break even quickly,” they instantly become a gambler. During his low point, Munger did not resort to high-risk short-term speculation to “get back fast.” Instead, he completely rebuilt his investment system: 1. Surround himself with the best: In 1978, he officially became Vice Chairman of Berkshire Hathaway, formally partnering with Buffett and converting most of his assets into Berkshire stock. 2. Abandon debt and deadly leverage: Having experienced a catastrophic collapse, Munger deeply understood that with enough time, compounding makes leverage unnecessary. 3. Shift from “buying cheap” to “buying great businesses”: He successfully convinced Buffett to abandon Graham’s “cigar butt” approach and instead buy outstanding businesses at reasonable prices. These years were not so much Munger’s 16 years of decline as they were his 16 years of self-reinvention. So when Munger regained his wealth peak in 1990, it was not merely a return to break-even—it was the construction of an unshakable compounding machine, followed by an epic surge. From that “finally back to even” moment in 1990 until his death at age 99 in 2023, his personal fortune soared into billions of dollars. Though still far behind Buffett in wealth, Munger’s intellect and character have arguably had an even greater impact on the world—and this was forged in those dark years. Even the greatest can suffer a 50% loss. The difference? Ordinary people sink into despair. Masters restart in adversity.