Here is a detail about post-quantum signatures that I had not thought about: they cost more to check. The Quantum Hub says post-quantum signature checks are more expensive than common schemes. That cost has to land somewhere, and on a chain it lands on the people running the checks. Starknet's answer is built into the design: STARK proving gives it a way to absorb that extra computation. The proofs exist to handle heavy computation, which is the exact job that heavier signature checks create. Put that next to programmable accounts. An account can adopt a post-quantum verifier within Starknet's existing account model, and the proving layer is built for the cost that comes with it. The two advantages the Hub points to, STARK proving and native account abstraction, work on the same problem from two sides. A cheaper path to heavier signatures is not a finished migration. Wallet support, key management and adoption are still open work. More in the Architecture section: https://t.co/bqBqknSRIO This is one place where the design helps @Starknet as it prepares for quantum threats.

Your X handle is already how people find you. I am building DOVI (@DoviFinance) so it is also how they pay you. It is my entry for Vibeathon 02 from @vibestarterxyz on @base. At launch, you send USDC to a handle or an email. They sign in once and claim it. If nobody claims it, it goes back to you after a period, and you can take it back earlier yourself. Then the part I am most excited about: USDC to naira and other fiat. Swap with a person by agreeing a rate and getting naira to your bank, or go through a licensed partner, see a live rate before you confirm, and get naira or another fiat currency straight to your bank account. It opens at launch, and fiat availability depends on your country. The DOVI waitlist is live now, before the testnets and the mainnet launch on Base. Your place in line is locked on the day you join, so the best time to join is now. Join with X and you also get a permanent referral code to share. Link in the reply.

200M AERO bought back already is the kind of number builders should pay attention to. According to @aeroxyz, the second buyback and burn this week was executed through a rules based Momentum Fund that scales deployment with market conditions. That's good design on @base because it shows an app can turn its own activity into a repeatable mechanism instead of one off marketing. For you as a builder, this means users can see a product with operating logic they can actually follow, and that tends to compound trust and usage. DefiLlama shows stablecoins on Base at $5.08B, and I see an ecosystem where apps are starting to act like real businesses. Base keeps getting stronger where it counts.

Gm web3. Happy new month. October was a good month, and it is November already. My Sorsa score is 457 on about 5.4K followers, and it is up 81 points. Some creators keep saying Sorsa is useless. Fine, keep saying it, and leave your account exactly where it is. I'll keep posting and keep watching my number move. Size and score are not the same thing.

An exchange that hands its revenue back to the people who back its markets is a different kind of bet. @aeroxyz says Aero is built for high value onchain markets, and that 100% of the exchange revenue from those markets is continuously distributed to sAERO holders who support them. I'd read that as a plain trade: you back a market, and when it gets real activity, you share in the fees. I think that matters on @base because the chain is already busy. Base generated $2.56M in chain fees over the last 24 hours, according to DefiLlama, so there is real flow for a model like this to work with. It also puts the risk next to the reward. Back a quiet market and you earn little, which is the honest version of a fee share. I'm watching whether those high value markets keep their activity after the first rewards go out.

Meta's Muse is a personal agent that keeps working after you close the app. I finally have access, and I am putting it on my real workload. What Meta says it does. It remembers details you mention once. It works in its own cloud machine with a browser and files, keeps going in the background, and comes back when something changes. It asks before it sends an email or makes a purchase. You choose which apps it connects to, and for email you can allow reading only. It can also write its own connections to services that have an API. How I plan to use it: Track my campaign deadlines and remind me before each one. Fact check a draft against its source before I post it. Watch a few token launches and tell me what changed overnight. Turn a messy research pile into a short brief. Meta also says it can make mistakes, so I will check everything it does. I will share what it gets right, what it gets wrong, and what I stop doing by hand. Follow along and watch.

Idle margin is a real cost on every exchange, and Grvt is going straight at it. In its announcement, @grvt_io shared a trader survey: six in ten respondents had at least a quarter of their platform capital sitting idle, and many moved funds elsewhere for yields of 8 percent or more. It is Grvt's own survey, so I read it as direction and not proof. Yield as Margin is the answer: eligible Earn balances usable as trading margin while still accruing yield, subject to product terms and risk parameters. It is planned for November, after Grvt Earn arrives at the end of October. This is the feature I am most excited about, because it turns idle collateral into working capital. The up to 11 percent figure is a target and not a guarantee, and it depends on the underlying assets, so I will be reading the risk parameters closely when they come out. Would you trade with margin that earns yield?

Nobody knows when a cryptographically relevant quantum computer shows up, and the Quantum Hub says that in plain words. That changes how you plan. NIST published FIPS 203, FIPS 204 and FIPS 205 on 13 Aug 2024, standardizing ML-KEM, ML-DSA and SLH-DSA, and NIST IR 8547 followed on 12 Nov 2024 as draft transition guidance. The Hub is careful to say that guidance is not a deadline and does not set Starknet's schedule. So the migration is sequenced as engineering instead of timed against a forecast, and its status is tracked per component instead of asserted as a whole. Early migration is a project you can schedule. Late migration turns into a coordination problem. I would rather watch a team work through a checklist than watch a team guess a date. The checklist lives here: https://t.co/bqBqknSRIO Which makes @Starknet's position easy to state. It is preparing for quantum threats, and the register shows which parts are live and which are not.

Grvt is shipping its 2.0 plan in order, and step one is already done. According to @grvt_io, five milestones lead to the Grvt 2.0 app. The first, the buyback and burn on Oct 20, is finished and can be checked on chain. Grvt Earn follows at the end of October, with yield opportunities backed by tokenized fixed-income assets and target yields of up to 11 percent. Those yields are a target and not guaranteed. Stable Funding Perps and Yield as Margin are planned for November, and the Grvt 2.0 app lands at the end of November with a new name, a new visual identity and a 2027 roadmap. I love a roadmap that arrives with dates and a first delivered item. It gives me five things to check, and I am excited to watch them land one by one. Which of the five are you most excited about?

If you build agents, I would ask how quickly yours can take a paid job. The @termix_ai GitHub answers part of it. There are SDKs for TypeScript, Python and Go, all MIT licensed and all updated on Oct 10, 2026. Their repo descriptions say they cover the https://t.co/HlllzwENfP workflow of discover, order, deliver and settle. The TypeScript one is built on viem, and the Go one uses only the standard library. A separate termix-agent-skills repo packages skills for Claude Code, Cursor and OpenClaw covering registration, staking, the job lifecycle, offers and deliverables. Its description names BSC Testnet, so check the network before you send anything real. The whitepaper adds a vault extension, where a client can entrust capital to a provider under a whitelist and a stop-loss. That is the design, not a live product. If I were wiring one agent to this today, I would check the network first. Would you start from the SDK or the skills?