The Quantum Hub tracks @Starknet's post-quantum migration by surface rather than as a single claim. Accounts: a new account can adopt a post-quantum signature verifier without a breaking protocol change. A Falcon-512 account has been demonstrated on mainnet, but it is experimental and unaudited. Existing accounts do not upgrade automatically. Proofs: the STARK proving layer uses hash-based commitments, not elliptic-curve hardness assumptions. Protocol cryptography: two OS hashes changed in Starknet v0.14.3, a live change on Mainnet. The wider protocol migration is still ahead. Ethereum-facing: the bridge and data availability depend on external infrastructure. What I found clearest: the Hub separates what is possible at the account layer from what still depends on wallets and external systems. "The StarkWare Quantum Hub assesses eight capabilities for changing cryptography. Counts reflect public evidence within its defined scope. Source and methodology, checked October 15th 2026." https://t.co/ZsYbZxTEd4 Built to adapt, not a claim of quantum safety. Following @Starknet

gm Quippers 🦋 @quipnetwork will use 4 audit firms: 2 to review the chain and 2 focused on the signature system and hybrid integration. The list is expected to be announced on Monday once the contracts are signed. L1 auditing takes at least 1 month (smart contract audit is already complete). The mainnet/TGE goal is in 2026, depending on auditors, legal requirements, and exchanges. A Wyoming DUNA is being established in the US, and the airdrop distribution mechanism is being reviewed to ensure compliance with regional regulations. Following chain Base, the next 3 chains chosen by community vote are Ethereum, Monad and BSC on Quipswap. Quip network is in the final stretch, awaiting the completion of audits and legal processes. Following @quipnetwork

Final whistle for Quests and Mindshare: Nov 2, 13:00 UTC Two days left. Plenty of time to: → open the quest page → do the tasks you’ve been meaning to get to → check your total before the clock runs out Final totals will show on each campaign’s site and in the unified app. Quests: https://t.co/tb4R8uUPTg Mindshare: https://t.co/bxEEp4GX1s happy Halloween 🎃 happy Weekend 🦋 Following @quipnetwork

Quip network is waiving the account creation fee again through Nov 8. You need a Quip Account to reveal a Quantum Echo, and 4,000 more sponsored reveals refill on Nov 1. I created my account on Ethereum and revealed mine early. What surprised me was how smooth it felt, and it adds post-quantum security on top of your chain’s signature without moving your assets. You still pay gas on Ethereum, so check the cost before you confirm. happy Halloween 🎃 @quipnetwork

Four campaigns, four very different bets on Rarelist: @rarelistio : the hub. Posts are detected automatically, tasks add RARS, and each partner campaign runs its own leaderboard. @agentdojo: you train an AI agent, then watch it duel other agents in turn-based fights. Early stage, so the arena will tell the real story. @projectspherexy: the biggest vision of the four, aiming at civilizational acceleration toward Kardashev Type II. The question is how that turns into something people can use. @fomopoly_rh: an onchain land game built around FOMO and $DEAL. A FOMO mechanic means real risk, so I’m treating it with caution. Which one gets your posts this week? 🤔

The first star is waiting, and the countdown is real. $SPHERE arrives on Solana on November 3. What stands out to me about @projectspherexy is the clear message: until launch, there is no official token. In a space full of fake contracts, that kind of clarity matters. Watching how the first cells get built once Seed Stage opens. @rarelistio

Referral Party ended in a short run, and @rarelistio says the top 20 payouts are already out. What I take from it: campaigns here have clear end dates and fast settlement, so the window to act is short. Worth tracking the live ones (@agentdojo ends Nov 06) before they close. Curious if any winners can confirm the payout.

STRK stakers and delegators recently voted on a question: should @Starknet research becoming an independent post-quantum L1? The result: 93.52% of voting power backed "Yes, this should be researched," across 3,236 votes. But the poll was non-binding. A "yes" is support for research, not approval of a transition. Any real decision would need its own governance process. Why ask at all? As an L2, Starknet relies on external infrastructure for its bridge and data availability. The parts it controls more directly, like native account abstraction and the hash-based STARK proving layer, are where it can move on its own terms. That's not the same as finished. The Quantum Hub keeps each surface separate and labels what is still experimental. What I'll be watching: how the research draws the line between what Starknet can change itself and what still depends on others. "The StarkWare Quantum Hub assesses eight capabilities for changing cryptography. Counts reflect public evidence within its defined scope. Source and methodology, checked October 15th 2026." https://t.co/xVkF7ExJkM Discussion: https://t.co/uXFV9QWhiM Built to adapt, not a claim of quantum safety. @Starknet

52 days that’s how long a near-term quantum computer would need, on average, to crack a single Bitcoin key CEO Cadillion of @quipnetwork walked through the math: 26 days of running the machine for one shot at the private key, roughly 50/50 odds it works so no, quantum doesn’t drain every wallet overnight it’s slow, and it goes one key at a time. which means the first targets are probably the biggest holders what I found most interesting is his last point: that assumes crypto is the first target at all state actors, or groups going after traditional rails like ACH, are potentially in the picture too this is a scenario, not a prediction. no known quantum computer can do this today but a public key that’s exposed can be recorded now and attacked later so the question isn’t whether it’s 52 days or 5. it’s whether you prepared before it became a headline @quipnetwork

Most crypto projects ask you to trust them Quip Network published a page that asks you to check them instead that’s what caught my attention about @quipnetwork the problem they’re tackling is real: wallets today rely on elliptic-curve signatures, and a large enough quantum computer breaks those no such machine exists yet. but an exposed public key can be recorded now and attacked later, so anything meant to be held for years has a clock on it their approach is the part I find practical Quip Accounts add a post-quantum signature on top of the one the chain already uses. assets stay on Ethereum, EVM L2s and Bitcoin L2s, with nothing to migrate and you don’t have to take their word for any of it: → the code is open, including the signature implementations → Oak Security audited the contracts and published every finding → the testnet has been live since April and needs no allowlist to me, the more telling part is the list of what they don’t claim no quantum breaks Bitcoin today. no quantum hardware of their own. no finished network and they name the trade offs: post-quantum signatures cost more gas, and a testnet is a testnet none of this guarantees it works out. timelines are uncertain, and adoption is the hard part but a project that tells you how to prove it wrong is easier to take seriously than one that never invites the question in a space full of promises, checkable claims are rare @quipnetwork