Most crypto projects ask you to trust them Quip Network published a page that asks you to check them instead that’s what caught my attention about @quipnetwork the problem they’re tackling is real: wallets today rely on elliptic-curve signatures, and a large enough quantum computer breaks those no such machine exists yet. but an exposed public key can be recorded now and attacked later, so anything meant to be held for years has a clock on it their approach is the part I find practical Quip Accounts add a post-quantum signature on top of the one the chain already uses. assets stay on Ethereum, EVM L2s and Bitcoin L2s, with nothing to migrate and you don’t have to take their word for any of it: → the code is open, including the signature implementations → Oak Security audited the contracts and published every finding → the testnet has been live since April and needs no allowlist to me, the more telling part is the list of what they don’t claim no quantum breaks Bitcoin today. no quantum hardware of their own. no finished network and they name the trade offs: post-quantum signatures cost more gas, and a testnet is a testnet none of this guarantees it works out. timelines are uncertain, and adoption is the hard part but a project that tells you how to prove it wrong is easier to take seriously than one that never invites the question in a space full of promises, checkable claims are rare @quipnetwork