The harder problem is not picking a post-quantum algorithm. It is being able to change cryptography without breaking what is already live. On @Starknet, accounts are programmable smart contracts, so signature logic sits in the account rather than the protocol. Proofs rely on hash-based commitments instead of elliptic-curve assumptions. Per the Quantum Hub, that lowers the migration burden. It doesn't finish it: Falcon-512 is experimental and unaudited, and the Ethereum-facing parts still depend on external infrastructure. What stood out to me: the Hub treats "lower burden" and "done" as two different claims. "The StarkWare Quantum Hub assesses eight capabilities for changing cryptography. Counts reflect public evidence within its defined scope. Source and methodology, checked October 15th 2026." https://t.co/xVkF7ExJkM Built to adapt, not a claim of quantum safety. Following @Starknet