very interesting reading. i agree with @paulbrigner these are valid concerns related to the lack of clear policies regarding the proposed destination for the ZCG funding stream (legal defense funding and the other one). i also agree with the need of having a balanced system that doesn't exclude valuable community contributors who don't hold big bags. it's important. fwiw, paul is a valuable long-term zcash contributor and has been under personal attacks during the current governance wars pushed mostly by the winklevoss and their employees/allies. they have engaged in what looks like coordinated character assassination attempts against paul and others, trying to discredit them, to discredit ZCG. these are not only ad-hominem logical fallacies, but they are also a disgusting political tactic that is (if it wasn't bad enough already) based on what now seem fake premises -- as paul properly addressed at the end of this article. worth the reading. onward.