Posts
avatar

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗮𝗻 𝗔𝗜 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗺 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁. 𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗺. AINFT's sample capital-preservation test is set in a high-volatility regime on BTC. Here are the rules of that test, as shown on its site: ⤞ Assets: BTC and ETH ⤞ Mode: spot, long only ⤞ Max drawdown: 8% ⤞ Window: 14 days, forward 𝗨𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁'𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗴𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝘀 𝗛𝗼𝗹𝗱, 𝗥𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗡𝗼 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲. It finished with a 6.4% return, 1.8% above the baseline, and a 4.1% drawdown, within the 8% limit. What I love about framing a test around volatility is that it shows character. Any agent can look smart when prices drift up slowly. You only learn who it really is when the market turns violent. 𝗗𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝘁 𝗽𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗰, 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲𝘇𝗲, 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹? That is the question I would want answered before giving any agent real money. AINFT designs its test to answer exactly that. See the high-volatility test here 👇 https://t.co/rtKgTzYgsf @justinsuntron @AINFTcom #TronEcoStar

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It may include third-party insights, sponsored content, or promotional material for which the creator may receive compensation. Nothing in this feed constitutes investment advice or a guarantee of returns. You are solely responsible for your own investment decisions. Always conduct your own research and exercise caution before trading. We do not guarantee the accuracy of third-party information and are not liable for any losses incurred. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please refer to our Community Terms and Risk Disclosure Statement for details.

avatarPost your reply

Comment