$29.7M. 6.85M SANDWICHES. 96% OF THEM ON PUMPFUN Bitquery counted 11 months of Solana sandwich bots: 2,545 bot wallets, 2.15M victim wallets, 309,010 SOL. same week PUMP did −12.68% in 24h and −25.8% in 9 days the idea: your slippage setting is the bot's budget i put the Bitquery study (via CryptoSlate, 12 Oct) and the AMBCrypto PUMP note (13 Oct) into one paper. receipts first ▹ the receipts 1. SCOPE: 30 Oct 2025 → 7 Oct 2026 · 6,850,144 successful sandwiches · 2,545 bot wallets · 2,154,994 victim wallets (wallets, not people) 2. VENUE: Pumpfun bonding curve + PumpSwap = 96% of every attack detected 3. TAKE: $29.7M gross · 309,010 SOL priced at the minute of each attack · ~$4.34 per sandwich. gross, not profit 4. CANNIBALS: 39% of the take came from other bots. the other 61% came from everyone else clicking buy 5. COSTS: in a 63-attack fee sample bots kept 68% of gross · 18 of 63 lost money after costs 6. SLIPPAGE: victims per 10k Jupiter swaps through the curve / PumpSwap: 8 at 1–3% · 44 at 3–10% · 87 at 10–20% · 148 at 20–50%. Bitquery: 20–50% gets hit 14× more than under 3% ▹ the catch nobody screenshots tight is not armor. exact-quote swaps got hit 36 per 10k and <0.5% got hit 27 per 10k, more than the 1–3% bucket at 8. Bitquery's own line: lower tolerance does not guarantee protection ▹ PUMP tape −12.68% in 24h · −25.8% in 9 days · BTC under $83k · AMBCrypto watches $0.0041–0.0047 as the retrace zone after the run to $0.0054–0.0068 · A/D rising since late Aug · CMF ~+0.20 alone one sandwich is $4. 6.85M of them is $29.7M, and 96% of it was cut on the same curve you ape on