Posts
avatar

I agree with buying what you care about, but we need a reality check on ENS. We ⁠.eth⁠ supporters are the ones paying with our money, time, and grassroots education to build this ecosystem. Yet the core team spends zero on marketing ⁠.eth⁠. It makes no sense—marketing ⁠.eth⁠ directly drives the registration revenue needed to fund the overarching mission. Instead, they take our ⁠.eth⁠ funds to build tech that empowers outside namespaces. We fund the stack, and they help non-.eth TLDs that just turn around and try to extract fees from the same ⁠.eth⁠ users who paid for that stack in the first place. They're even pushing us outside of ⁠.eth⁠ just to get basic privacy. This needs a constitutional fix: if a project uses the ENS tech stack, they must be required to support ⁠.eth⁠. This would create a massive network effect that benefits everyone while actually respecting the community that funds the DAO. Add in the fact that ENSv2 is massively overdue and the official app is still getting lapped by community-built tools like ENS Vision, Grail, and NameWhisper. We love ⁠.eth⁠, but let’s be real—the community is carrying the weight right now

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It may include third-party insights, sponsored content, or promotional material for which the creator may receive compensation. Nothing in this feed constitutes investment advice or a guarantee of returns. You are solely responsible for your own investment decisions. Always conduct your own research and exercise caution before trading. We do not guarantee the accuracy of third-party information and are not liable for any losses incurred. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please refer to our Community Terms and Risk Disclosure Statement for details.

avatarPost your reply

Comment