Posts
avatar

Bitcoin Stalls at $80K: On-Chain Data Reveals Who Is Selling via @cryptoquant_com Bitcoin has again tested $80,000 but failed to hold above it. ETF inflows and lower U.S. Treasury yields have supported demand, while profit-taking by existing holders continues to cap the upside. On-chain data shows that nearly every investor group has returned to profit. The unrealized PnL indicator stands at 21.1 for long-term holders, 13.4 for short-term holders, 13.9 for one-day-to-one-month capital, and 5.3 for the newest investors. This signals a healthier market, but also means more holders now have profits available to realize. The SOPR Ratio, calculated by dividing LTH-SOPR by STH-SOPR, briefly rose to around 1.4 as Bitcoin approached $80,000. This suggests long-term holders were realizing profits at a higher relative rate than short-term holders. The ratio has since fallen to 0.93, indicating that short-term holders’ realized performance is now relatively stronger. A sustained break above $80,000, backed by continued ETF and spot demand, could open the way toward $88,000–$90,000. However, a loss of the $75,000–$76,000 support zone could weaken short-term holder profitability and accelerate the correction. The key question is not whether Bitcoin can briefly touch $80,000, but whether new demand can absorb selling from profitable holders. https://t.co/qtloPVR96C

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It may include third-party insights, sponsored content, or promotional material for which the creator may receive compensation. Nothing in this feed constitutes investment advice or a guarantee of returns. You are solely responsible for your own investment decisions. Always conduct your own research and exercise caution before trading. We do not guarantee the accuracy of third-party information and are not liable for any losses incurred. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please refer to our Community Terms and Risk Disclosure Statement for details.

avatarPost your reply

Comment