There will most likely be antitrust lawsuit against @SpaceX if the democrats win the 2028 Presidency.

😡😡😡IT HAS APPEARED AGAIN, UNLUCKILY 😡😡😡 🚨 Michael Burry’s Chilling Dot-Com Analogy: Could Mega IPOs Drain Liquidity and Crash the Market? The legend of "The Big Short," Michael Burry, has once again pointed to a structural threat on X (Twitter) that could shake Wall Street awake. Burry’s warnings about the upcoming wave of mega IPOs—SpaceX (~$1.75 trillion), OpenAI (~$1 trillion), and Anthropic—can be broken down as follows: 🔷 1. Capital Concentration and Liquidity Vacuum During the Dot-Com bubble of 2000, 446 companies entering the market collectively raised $108.15 billion, spreading liquidity across a broad base. Today, the situation is far more dangerous and concentrated. Just these three giants—SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic—have the potential, adjusted for inflation, to absorb more capital than all hundreds of companies combined at the peak of the Dot-Com era. 🔷 2. Exit Liquidity and Institutional Imperatives Burry’s greatest fear is precisely this: When BlackRock, Vanguard, or major hedge funds seek to add SpaceX or OpenAI to their portfolios, money won’t magically appear from the sky. To fund these massive positions, they’ll be forced to sell existing holdings—leaders like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple—and convert them into cash. This triggers a massive sell-off pressure on today’s tech giants, creating a domino effect. As the analyst put it: “Once capital markets dry up, there’s no fuel left to keep the index at its peak.” 🔷 3. Nasdaq Rules and Burry’s “Dishonest Manipulation” Outburst Last month, Burry fiercely criticized Nasdaq’s planned rule changes ahead of SpaceX’s IPO. Normally, new companies must wait 12 months before being eligible for inclusion in an index. But under the new “Fast Entry” rule, SpaceX could be added to the Nasdaq-100 in just 15 days. Moreover, despite its minimal free float, passive index funds (like QQQ) would be forced by multiplier rules to buy billions of dollars’ worth of SpaceX shares. Burry responded bluntly: “Your 401(k) retirement funds will become the exit liquidity for these giants.” 🔷 4. Cross-Dependency Among Companies The details in the text—Microsoft’s 49% reliance on OpenAI and Oracle’s 54%—reveal how deeply systemic risk is intertwined. Any valuation collapse or corporate budget contraction among these AI leaders would directly drag down the balance sheets of cloud and chip giants supplying their infrastructure—and thus undermine the entire S&P 500’s profitability growth. 🧩 Macro Commentary History doesn’t repeat itself, but it rhymes. We must not forget how the Nasdaq crashed 80% in March 2000 after IPO activity peaked. The simultaneous race by these three mega-companies to capture institutional capital could trigger a massive outflow from today’s already bloated tech stocks. Burry always warns early—sometimes too early—but the mathematical risks he identifies are always real. #MichaelBurry #IPO #SpaceX #OpenAI #Anthropic #MarketCrash #Nasdaq

🚨 What happened over the last 24 hours > US indices hit records, but rotation underneath is violent. > Dow strength shows old-economy names are catching bids, while Nasdaq remains driven by AI, chips, quantum, and software names. > Snowflake $SNOW ripping +36% while Salesforce $CRM dropped -2.8% says a lot. > AI infrastructure and agentic AI enablers are winning, while legacy SaaS is starting to feel the pressure. > The bigger shock was SpaceX’s S-1 allegedly revealing 18,712 BTC on its balance sheet, more than 2x what on-chain analysts had tracked. > Shows that on-chain analysis is not a complete market ledger. > It only shows what can be tracked. If SpaceX can hide over half its BTC exposure, other institutions may also be undercounted. > SpaceX’s upcoming IPO could become a liquidity drain for crypto, especially if capital starts chasing the reopened tech IPO market instead.

SpaceX's IPO could indeed bring significant to how we view and invest in space stocks change the crypto game for the whole industry

SpaceX is a meme stock. That's the provocative claim from ValueEdge Advisors chair Nell Minow, and not for the usual reasons. No Reddit hype, no retail frenzy. Her argument is simpler: the governance fundamentals are hollow. But here's the counterargument history keeps making: Elon Musk doesn't play by conventional rules and keeps winning anyway. He made Tesla synonymous with EVs. He made reusable rockets real when aerospace veterans said it was impossible. He fired 80% of Twitter's staff and the platform survived. Governance red flags and all, the man has a habit of proving everyone wrong.

1/ We had an incredible discussion on our X Spaces this morning exploring the "Evolution of Corporate Bitcoin" hosted by @AllenHODL Our phenomenal panel of corporate trailblazers featured: 🔹 @kpperdelwitz & @RolandTalalas (@GIGABTC) 🔹 @btconlyscott (@XCEOfficial) 🔹 @ShoneAnstey (@LQWDTech) 👇 A thread on the top takeaways...

A Tesla-SpaceX merger under Elon Musk would combine both companies' Bitcoin holdings into a single corporate treasury worth roughly $3.3 billion, placing the merged entity among the top five largest corporate Bitcoin holders globally.

SpaceX currently holds $1.4 billion worth of $BTC. According to the latest filings, @elonmusk's @SpaceX now holds some 18,712 Bitcoins, worth more than $1,400,000,000 at time of writing. When the company finally goes public under the ticker $SPCX, it will have the largest $BTC holdings of any company in the world. Question is, will it sell its stacks if/when Bitcoin recovers?