MtGox was a more catastrophic theft than quantum will ever be. * 70% of all trading volume * 850,000 bitcoins stolen from them * 6% of all bitcoins that existed at the time * Roughly 1/10th of the entire marketcap of Bitcoin Look where we are now.

If you buy 1BTC today, you actually get 1BTC + 1Quantum resistant BTC per BTC. Few understand this.

$ALGO IS A TOP 10 PROJECT #crypto #algorand #QuantumSafe

You are a Bitcoin holder - you hear about a new proposal - called BIP-361 - something about quantum threats you don’t think much Bitcoin has always worked time passes - devs start talking about old wallets “Satoshi-era coins” “P2PK vulnerability” you read deeper - around 1.7M BTC exposed ~1.1M BTC from Satoshi - untouched for 16 years worth ~$70B+ then you see it, the plan - upgrade the network - give everyone a few years - migrate to quantum-safe addresses seems normal, until phase B - old signatures become invalid - funds that don’t move get frozen forever “for security” the rules change move your coins or lose them Satoshi’s wallet could be frozen the biggest holder in Bitcoin now the question is simple who decides what stays and what disappears?

In Bitcoins News A new proposal that basically reads ...we're forcing you off the "old vulnerable system" onto a new ... slower ... unproven one ... for your "safety" and if you miss the 5-year window ... your coins are bricked forever. Since when can developers freeze addresses ON-chain? Since when do addresses not have a choice? ... what if I want to stay on the "old" & "vulnerable" system ... what if this new system is actually more vulnerable to other attacks ... who the f are these devs anyways, do they truly serve the interest of the community

JUST IN: Charles Hoskinson on BIP-361, says "we as an industry are here to help. We have sharded PoW protocols, NIPoPoWs that enable trustless sidechains, eUTXO from #Cardano $ADA, Hydra, and they can turn Bitcoin into a leviathan. If you're gonna do a hard fork, do it right!"