📡 Daily ETF Snapshot: $877.0M Net Outflows 🟢 BTC ETFs : $174.6M 🟢ETH ETFs : $25.9M ️🔴SOL ETFs : -$5.2M 🟢XRP ETFs : $0K 🟢HYPE ETFs : $10.5M ➡️ Total: $205.8M net inflows

📈 Solana ETFs recorded 1.79M SOL in total net inflows as of Sep 4. @Bitwise’s BSOL led the inflows, accounting for 1.23M SOL. Followed by 👇 ▫️ GSOL (@Grayscale) : +270.91K SOL ▫️ FSOL (@Fidelity) : +183.44K SOL ▫️ TSOL (@21shares) : +38.22K SOL ▫️ VSOL (@vaneck_us) : +36.48K SOL

Active managers are making more revenue after converting their MF to an ETFs despite charging lower fees. How's that possible? Bc the inflows are that good over here. The funds that were converted went from outflows of $4/year to inflows of $16b = ETF IT AND THEY WILL COME. via @DavidCohne

ETF Flows Update (7 September 2026) • $BTC : +$174.60 Million • $ETH : +$26.46 Million • $XRP : $0 • $SOL : -$5.21 Million • $HYPE : +$10.52 Million Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs recorded solid net inflows of $174.60M and $26.46M respectively on September 4, while Hyperliquid attracted $10.52M. Solana saw a modest outflow of $5.21M and XRP remained flat at zero.

US spot bitcoin ETFs just posted their strongest three-week stretch of 2026. Last week closed at $986.9M, taking the three-week total to $3.8B. Thursday alone added $730.9M, the biggest day since January 14. Total net assets sat at $101.3B on Friday, with cumulative net inflows at $55.6B.

#BTC will close green in September. 1. ETFs are a structural buyer that did not exist in old “red Septembers” From 2017–2022 Bitcoin posted a string of negative Septembers. 2023–2025 were all green. The difference is persistent institutional demand through spot ETFs. Flows have continued into early September rather than immediately reversing after the August spike. 2. The Fed meeting on September 15–16 is the main catalyst: Fed hold the interest rates. 3. Regulatory calendar is still live. The CLARITY Act (U.S. market-structure bill) missed the August window and was pushed into September after the Senate returns around September 14–15. #Bitcoin #Crypto

BLACKROCK'S IBIT LED BITCOIN ETF INFLOWS ON FRIDAY - $117.4M IN CLIENT-DRIVEN PURCHASES. The iShares Bitcoin Trust accounted for roughly two-thirds of Friday's $174.6M net inflows into U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs. Over three consecutive days, IBIT-related buying totaled ~$686.8M. · Friday IBIT Inflows: $117.4M · Friday Total BTC ETF Inflows: $174.6M · IBIT Share of Friday's Total: ~67% · Three-Day IBIT Total: ~$686.8M Critical Context: These figures refer to net creations of $ETF shares, backed by Bitcoin held with custodians. Sustained inflows translate into larger BTC holdings within the fund not proprietary balance-sheet buying by BlackRock. This is client demand, not BlackRock's own balance sheet. Institutions are buying Bitcoin and they're buying it through BlackRock. Is this institutional accumulation before a breakout or distribution before a drop?

Bitcoin is struggling with $80K — but institutional capital hasn’t disappeared. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs absorbed roughly $1.01B in net inflows across the last three trading sessions. Meanwhile, $BTC remains near $80K as $ZEC, $TAO, $NEAR and $LINK outperform. Observation: capital is entering crypto, but the immediate price response is increasingly showing up outside Bitcoin. Watch the rotation. CashCognizance | Insight → Income

👀 BTC near $80K + ETF inflows + major regulation = a very interesting week for crypto. What’s your biggest catalyst right now? 👇

I believe this is the correct way to interpret ETF data— The Net Flow-to-Volume Ratio. Also known as the ETF Flow-to-Volume Ratio (FVR), it tracks the relative change between the 30-day net flow and trading volume of ETFs, measured in crypto terms, making it immune to price fluctuations. When the red line is above zero, it indicates that over the past 30 days, buying pressure has outweighed selling pressure—APs are conducting net subscriptions, and capital is flowing in. A higher value means most of the volume is one-sided, reflecting market consensus. Conversely, if the line is below zero, it suggests that most of the volume consists of offsetting trades, indicating divergence. By observing this metric, we can easily notice that FVR generally moves in strong alignment with BTC’s price, demonstrating a mutual and interdependent relationship at the fundamental level. However, FVR can sometimes act as a leading indicator of sentiment—moving ahead of price action. For instance, in the regions marked in red on the chart, price rose while FVR declined—this signals growing divergence among traditional U.S. capital. Alternatively, as shown in the green-marked areas, FVR dropped significantly faster than price, indicating rapidly spreading market panic. Currently, we are witnessing the former scenario—there are early signs emerging. The market is absorbing selling pressure and needs to rebuild price consensus. Final note: ETF data is freely and publicly available, yet this does not diminish its importance. However, I do not recommend drawing conclusions based on single-day fluctuations or isolated net inflows/outflows. Instead, observing trends over a longer period provides a more reasonable perspective.