I think Wallet Score raises an important question worth considering: Should the same wallet receive exactly the same score across different contexts? For example, a wallet that has consistently provided liquidity with stable fund retention periods might be a highly valuable participant in a liquidity mining campaign. But in a lending scenario, you’d need to examine its historical borrowing, repayment, and collateral records. This is precisely what @zerufinance’s Context-specific Scoring highlights: Different decisions require different behavioral signals. I believe this evaluation approach better aligns with real-world needs—after all, each protocol is looking for different types of participants.