Posts
avatar

Unpopular opinion: "𝗽𝗮𝘆 𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹" 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗳 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝗜. Think about how you'd bill an LLM. You don't know the cost until the answer is written. Or a data stream that fires hundreds of tiny requests a minute. One flat price per request breaks in both cases. What I like about x402 in Bank of AI is that it doesn't force one shape. The docs list different schemes for different jobs: ➜ 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁: pay the advertised amount, simple and predictable ➜ 𝘂𝗽𝘁𝗼: sign for a maximum, the server settles only real usage. Built for 𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗟𝗟𝗠 𝘁𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻 𝘂𝘀𝗮𝗴𝗲 ➜ 𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵-𝘀𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁: deposit once, pay many requests with off-chain vouchers, settle in 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, with a refund path ➜ 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁_𝗴𝗮𝘀𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲: TRON only, pay in USDT or USDD 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗧𝗥𝗫 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗴𝗮𝘀 That's the difference between a payment demo and a payment system. 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘆. If you're building an AI service, which one fits you: 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁, 𝘂𝗽𝘁𝗼 𝗼𝗿 𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵? @justinsuntron @AINFTcom #TRONEcoStar

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It may include third-party insights, sponsored content, or promotional material for which the creator may receive compensation. Nothing in this feed constitutes investment advice or a guarantee of returns. You are solely responsible for your own investment decisions. Always conduct your own research and exercise caution before trading. We do not guarantee the accuracy of third-party information and are not liable for any losses incurred. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please refer to our Community Terms and Risk Disclosure Statement for details.

avatarPost your reply

Comment