A network's development shouldn't be understood only through the people building it. The decision-making process matters too. INFINIT's MiCAR whitepaper describes a governance model in which $IN supports participation in decisions concerning the network. Token holders can participate through: - Voting: Taking part in decisions on key network parameters. - Proposals: Submitting ideas for network development. - Community deliberation: Discussing proposed changes before implementation. The whitepaper also explains that changes to fundamental token characteristics or functionality must follow a structured governance process. Even core contributors cannot unilaterally change the token's fundamental properties. Proposed updates require broad consensus or governance approval. This is an important distinction: governance is not simply about holding a token. It is about the processes through which a network considers and approves changes. Building a network matters. So does deciding how it evolves.