just sat there for 20 minutes refreshing the same Contract from both wallets and still half expecting one side to be out of sync. @RomeProtocol does something that kept feeling wrong until i watched the Synthetic Address move... Solana wallet signs a v1 tx, EVM side sees the exact same msg.sender and Balance update on the same Deployment. no second contract, no mirrored state. the EVM is just running as a Program inside Solana, so the ledger is literally the same one... i keep catching myself looking for the Bridge or the Wrapper. there isn’t one. MetaMask users and Solana users are just two ways of signing for the same Accounts... for a Solidity team that already has users on both sides, that removes the "pick a home" decision more cleanly than anything else i’ve tested this week. still grinding the docs and the dual-lane examples on Hadrian... anyone else actually tried hitting the same Contract from both MetaMask and a Solana wallet on Testnet? what broke first for you?