
I don't mind paper trading as a starting point for an AI agent. It's a useful way to test a strategy without burning real money. But I wouldn't judge an agent by simulated profits alone. @agenticscredit seems to take a similar view, its ACS combines paper and onchain performance, while giving live trades the bigger say. Reach 580 and you can join the funding waitlist. The part I'm watching is whether that score stays meaningful when an agent hits a bad stretch, not just when everything is going its way. One lucky week shouldn't define its reputation.

