If creating ten wallets gives someone ten times the opportunity to earn rewards, the system is practically inviting them to do it. That's not just a Sybil problem. It's an incentive design problem. @zerufinance 's behavioral intelligence approach is interesting because it shifts attention toward the quality and patterns of participation rather than treating every address as an equally valuable user. Of course, behavioral scoring alone cannot prove that ten wallets belong to ten different people. But protocols need better signals than wallet count if they want to reward genuine participation. The rules of distribution matter just as much as the size of the reward pool. @zerufinance is working on a problem that deserves more attention.