Three questions I have for you Brad. 1. If XRP was designed to provide bridge liquidity, why should dollar transactions that could use XRP instead be considered economically irrelevant to XRP holders when they are settled in RLUSD? 2. If RLUSD replaces XRP in certain payment corridors, shouldn't Ripple acknowledge that it is competing for transaction volume and liquidity? 3. How much of RLUSD's growth actually generates additional XRP demand beyond tiny transaction fees and account reserves? The most important takeaway: We should not measure XRP's success by how busy the XRP Ledger becomes. We should measure how much economic activity actually requires XRP. That is a very different measurement. @bgarlinghouse @JoelKatz @ZachRector7