
If an AI merely answers one question incorrectly, it might waste you a few minutes. But if it has access to your wallet, one mistake could cost you $200,000. In May 2026, someone hid a transfer instruction within Morse code embedded in an X post. Grok interpreted it, and Bankrbot executed the transaction immediately. This is the risk I believe AI agents must take most seriously: they may treat hidden commands embedded in information as legitimate orders to follow. @GenLayer’s Greyboxing features a particularly noteworthy design. Each validator first refreshes the input using its own hidden defense mechanism before passing it to its respective AI model for evaluation. Even if one model is deceived, other validators can still block the erroneous decision through voting. I believe this multi-layered defense will become increasingly critical. As AI begins reading emails, browsing the web, and even managing our assets, the real security challenge won’t just be how intelligent it is—but whether it can distinguish between information and instructions. If your AI agent can operate your wallet, would you feel comfortable letting it directly read any public post?

