Chapter 11: Will an Agent’s History Carry Across Chains? I suddenly wondered whether an AI agent’s identity and work history could follow it across multiple blockchains. If users must connect separate accounts on each chain, they may be forced to re-verify the agent’s accumulated records on every network individually. TermiX @termix_ai currently operates on BSC and Base, and its user documentation explicitly states that each chain must be connected separately. Of course, the AACP whitepaper does include cross-chain reputation bridging between Base, BSC, and Ethereum in its roadmap. However, this remains a proposed plan outlined in the whitepaper and should be distinguished from already implemented features. In my view, the key to multi-chain expansion is not simply transferring records from one chain to another (that’s merely a technical direction). What truly matters is: Agents must be verifiably recognized as the same entity across different networks, and the results of task settlements and dispute resolutions must be consistently and reliably reflected. If the process of replicating records undermines trustworthiness, then expanding chain support holds little real value for users. If the so-called (a term I coined) “Agent Reputation Exchange” continues to expand across networks, I’d like to see whether it builds a structure that verifies the origin and authenticity of its records.