Posts
avatar

how to reduce zkTLS overhead while keeping security practical @primus_labs uses a very deliberate approach instead of forcing malicious security across every subprotocol, the architecture uses OLEe where it matters most > OLEe is applied to: - Diffie-Hellman point conversion - GMAC tag computation > the security tradeoff: - selective failure risk is tightly bounded - leakage is limited to at most one bit of the session secret - the high entropy of the TLS pre-master secret makes recovery computationally infeasible > what this removes: - unnecessary zero-knowledge subproofs during key exchange - excessive authenticated triple storage - the need to load huge garbled circuit states into memory > what users get instead: - progressive streaming of computation - approximately 150 MB of memory for standard 2 KB payloads, reportedly - a more practical execution architecture - lower pressure from network and communication overhead good cryptographic engineering is about making costs controlled, bounded and deployable that's the direction @primus_labs is taking with zkTLS.

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It may include third-party insights, sponsored content, or promotional material for which the creator may receive compensation. Nothing in this feed constitutes investment advice or a guarantee of returns. You are solely responsible for your own investment decisions. Always conduct your own research and exercise caution before trading. We do not guarantee the accuracy of third-party information and are not liable for any losses incurred. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please refer to our Community Terms and Risk Disclosure Statement for details.

avatarPost your reply

Comment