One thing I find interesting about @Starknet is that security is not just about the technology you use today. It is also about how much control you have when that technology needs to change. As an Ethereum L2, Starknet still relies on parts of Ethereum’s infrastructure. That creates an important question when looking ahead to potential quantum threats. What happens if today’s cryptographic standards eventually need replacing? Starknet can work on upgrading its own security, but some changes may also depend on Ethereum’s ability to adapt. This is part of the thinking behind exploring a move towards an independent L1. The idea is not that Ethereum is insecure. It’s about having greater control over critical decisions, especially the timeline for future security upgrades. Quantum computing may not pose an immediate threat, and there are still many unknowns. Moving towards an independent L1 would not automatically solve every challenge either. But preparing before a threat becomes urgent makes sense to me. Strong security matters, but having the flexibility to evolve that security could matter just as much. Research worth keeping an eye on. 👀