One thing we rarely consider when setting up a crypto wallet is how easily its security can adapt to future threats. What happens when the cryptographic methods we rely on today need to be replaced? @Starknet has an interesting approach to this through native account abstraction. Since each Starknet account is a smart contract, its transaction authorization logic can be customized without requiring the entire network to upgrade. Here’s why that matters: → Wallets can adopt different signature verification methods. → Users can potentially upgrade security without changing their account address or moving their assets. → Individual accounts can make these changes without waiting for a network wide upgrade. Starknet’s Quantum Hub also includes an Account Change assessment in its Bunker Checklist to evaluate this kind of flexibility. But there’s an important distinction: being able to change signature schemes doesn’t automatically make every wallet quantum resistant. Broader dependencies and other security considerations still matter. What I appreciate is the focus on adaptability. We can’t assume today’s cryptography will remain secure forever. Building systems that can accommodate new methods could make future transitions much easier. The goal isn’t to predict every threat. It’s to make sure our wallets have a way to respond when security standards evolve. 🔐