Crypto security isn’t just about protecting our assets today. It’s also about preparing for threats that could emerge tomorrow. That’s one reason I find @Starknet’s approach to account flexibility interesting, especially with quantum computing advancing. Think about how wallets work. We rely on cryptographic signatures to approve transactions, but what happens if the methods we use today eventually become vulnerable? Starknet’s programmable accounts offer an interesting path forward. Instead of locking every account into one signature scheme, developers can build support for different authorization methods at the account level. There are two things worth separating here: → Signatures determine whether a transaction is authorized. → STARK proofs provide cryptographic evidence that computations were performed correctly. They solve different problems, so changing an account’s signature method doesn’t automatically require replacing the proving system. Of course, Starknet isn’t fully quantum resistant today. Ethereum dependencies and other parts of the stack still need consideration. But preparing for future cryptographic changes before they become urgent is a smart move. We don’t know exactly what tomorrow’s threats will look like. Building systems that can adapt could make all the difference. Explore the research 👇 https://t.co/qLZHtbRjDd