Posts
avatar

I've been saying it... @arc keeps building. Extended, the decentralized perpetual futures exchange, migrated nearly $120 million in TVL from Starknet to Arc. Yeah, Starknet looks like it's dying, but why Arc and not another network? What does a blockchain need to offer for a protocol to decide to move its liquidity? For a trading protocol, collateral, liquidations, execution costs, and capital efficiency all matter. This means users don't need to hold an additional native token just to cover transaction fees. Extended's migration also includes $USDC and cirBTC as collateral options. Here's where things get interesting: Combining stablecoin liquidity with Bitcoin exposure within the same trading infrastructure. The question isn't how many blockchains can launch. It's how many can attract real economic activity and sustain it over time. I believe arc can turn its stablecoin-based infrastructure into a sustainable DeFi ecosystem.

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It may include third-party insights, sponsored content, or promotional material for which the creator may receive compensation. Nothing in this feed constitutes investment advice or a guarantee of returns. You are solely responsible for your own investment decisions. Always conduct your own research and exercise caution before trading. We do not guarantee the accuracy of third-party information and are not liable for any losses incurred. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please refer to our Community Terms and Risk Disclosure Statement for details.

avatarPost your reply

Comment