Posts
avatar

$TSLA $ARKK $DRIV #Tesla #FSD #Robotaxi #Optimus #Earnings #Investing The case for $386, in the company's terms. The margin is recovering: 18.1% on cars excluding credits against 15.4% a year ago, with credit revenue down to $113 million. Paying FSD customers rose 67% to 1.74 million, 17% of every Tesla ever delivered, and the company reports its largest passenger-vehicle backlog in four years with eleven days of inventory; batteries, not demand, limit volume. The robotaxi fleet went from tens to hundreds in a quarter. Optimus production began on Fremont's high-volume lines. The balance sheet holds $45.4 billion against $9.5 billion of debt. A company like that, the argument runs, is pricing the slope, not the level, and a model anchored to today's fleet will always look too low. If self-driving works it replaces car ownership, not ride-hailing: the 4.8 million robotaxis the price requires would drive about 8% of US miles. A large share, not an impossible one. TON618 tests the earnings, the cash and the size of what the price requires; it cannot test, inside a ten-year model, how fast a fleet compounds once it works. That rate is carried as the bull case and as tripwires, not as a verdict.

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It may include third-party insights, sponsored content, or promotional material for which the creator may receive compensation. Nothing in this feed constitutes investment advice or a guarantee of returns. You are solely responsible for your own investment decisions. Always conduct your own research and exercise caution before trading. We do not guarantee the accuracy of third-party information and are not liable for any losses incurred. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please refer to our Community Terms and Risk Disclosure Statement for details.

avatarPost your reply

Comment