Interesting read on the future of agent-to-agent commerce. One takeaway that stood out to me: payments might be the easiest part of the agentic economy. We’re seeing a lot of infrastructure being built around AI agents making payments. But what happens when agents start negotiating, trading, and managing financial risks with each other? The article raises a few interesting points: 1. Payment ≠ Trust. Agents can transfer money instantly, but that doesn’t guarantee the other party will deliver. Escrow, collateral, and enforceable commitments become essential. 2. Agents will need to hedge risks. Think GPU prices, compute availability, or delivery deadlines. Most of these risks are too specific for traditional financial markets. 3. Markets could become disposable. An agent creates a market around a specific risk, other agents provide liquidity if they have a reason to, and the market disappears once the event is settled. The third point is particularly interesting. We might be moving toward a world where markets are created on demand, not just for assets people want to trade, but for uncertainties that individual agents need to manage. This also makes me think about what we’re building with @puffer_unifi. If agents are going to coordinate economic activity at machine speed, they’ll need more than payment rails. They’ll need high-performance execution, fast transaction assurances, and access to Ethereum’s liquidity and financial primitives. That’s where infrastructure like Puffer UniFi could play an important role. The next wave of agentic commerce may not be defined by how much money agents move, but by how much economic activity they can coordinate on their own.