In the future, projects like @primus_labs may become essential tools for institutions to prove their asset strength. Today, the crypto market faces a very real problem: Funding can be fabricated, data can be falsified—project teams may claim to have secured massive financing or manage enormous assets, yet ordinary users have little way to verify the truth. Even more troubling is that many figures, if presented convincingly enough, become powerful marketing tools. Investors, seeing backing from well-known institutions, impressive funding numbers, and large asset scales, often mistake these for proof of a project’s legitimacy. But are these claims truly verifiable? I believe what the crypto market needs isn’t just more projects publishing data—it needs data that can be independently verified. For example: if a project claims to hold a certain amount of reserves, can it prove those assets actually exist? If an institution asserts strong financial backing, can it provide credible asset verification without compromising account privacy? This is what the market truly needs. For institutions, full financial transparency isn’t feasible—but complete opacity makes it impossible to earn market trust. The solution lies in enabling external verification of key information while preserving privacy. This is how I view @primus_labs: if its products are widely adopted by institutions in the future, they could become vital tools for asset attestation and reserve verification. However, whether they truly become an industry standard will depend entirely on future institutional adoption. The crypto market has never lacked polished-looking data—it has lacked verifiable data. When the market begins seriously questioning the authenticity of claims, truly valuable infrastructure will finally emerge.