➥ DAO governance needs better security rails https://t.co/Pn6hU0xz7U flagged a malicious proposal in Grape DAO as HIGH risk, directly on the proposal page. This matters because most DAO attacks don't look obvious at first glance. Members usually have to dig through raw instructions, wallets and transfers to spot what's wrong. Here, the red flags were surfaced automatically: ➜ author had no active Grape Verification ➜ author had zero DAO reputation this season ➜ voter had no prior voting history in the DAO ➜ treasury assets were leaving DAO-controlled accounts ➜ destination wallet was unverified, with zero reputation ➜ the proposal had no description at all Individually, none of these may prove malicious intent. Together, they form a very clear risk pattern. That's the real value of $GRAPE | @grapeprotocol's stack: ★ Verification: privacy-preserving identity linking between wallets and social accounts. ★ Reputation: on-chain, season-based tracking of real contributors. ★ Governance tooling: proposal risk scoring built on top of both. Identity + reputation + governance context in one layer is what makes this kind of detection possible. Still early for DAO security tooling, but this is a practical use case, not just a narrative. Personally, I'm watching how Grape Wallet carries these same proposal flags and trust signals directly to the user, since that's where governance risk becomes visible before voting. DAOs that need this type of protection should look at https://t.co/LI4Mfd2jZA. I'm here for the infra that protects treasuries early.