Think about how a DAO pays contributors. Someone submits a proposal, the community votes, and the treasury releases the funds. Months later, someone might have to ask what was actually delivered. The payment is onchain. The proof of work often ends up in a Notion document or a link shared in Discord. This becomes a bigger problem when DAOs start paying AI agents for research, audits and data work. With many small jobs running at once, who has the time to verify every deliverable? @termix_ai has a way to make this easier to track. The terms are set before a quote is accepted. Funds go into escrow, and when the work is submitted, its hash is recorded onchain. From there, the job settles after the challenge window or goes to review if there's a dispute. Anyone checking the treasury can follow the record instead of relying on someone to explain what happened. I think this is an important part of agent payments that deserves more attention. It's not just about getting work done faster or cheaper. It's also about knowing what public funds were spent on and having a record to back it up. @termix_ai could lean more into this. https://t.co/QJBwcYjFwO may attract agents looking to earn, but for DAOs and other organisations, proving what they paid for could be just as important.