The AI agent paid the invoice, But who takes responsibility if the order goes wrong? Imagine a manufacturing company deploying an AI agent to buy machine components. The agent discovers a supplier through XDC AI, places an order and pays in USDC using x402. Payment received. Transaction confirmed. Everything looks good. Then the supplier discovers that the agent ordered the wrong components, or that the purchase was never authorised. The blockchain can show the payment. The wallet can show the transaction. But neither automatically tells the supplier who stands behind that agent. This is the missing piece in autonomous commerce. With Concordium's Verified by @Concordium badge on @XDCNetwork AI, an agent can carry on-chain proof that a verified person or business is accountable for it, without exposing the owner's identity publicly. The agent keeps its XDC wallet and continues operating on XDC AI. Concordium adds the identity layer beneath it. That distinction matters. x402 helps an agent pay. Verified ownership helps establish who stands behind it. The badge doesn't guarantee that the agent will always make the right decision. It gives counterparties something important to check before deciding whether to trust it with a transaction. As AI agents move from answering questions to spending real money, shouldn't knowing who stands behind them be part of the process? $CCD