Using BTC as an adjective for projects has become one of the core PR narratives in today’s market. For example, ZEC is called “privacy BTC,” and PRL is called “AI inference BTC.” The project we’re discussing today, Quantus, is also frequently described as “post-quantum BTC.” Since this topic isn’t widely discussed in Chinese-speaking circles, I’ll provide a brief overview. 1. Its current market cap ranges between $30M–$40M. At a price of $130, the fully diluted valuation (FDV) is $2.73B—already a very high valuation. Daily inflation is 2,200 tokens (equating to $286K at $130), and the remaining uncirculated supply decreases linearly by approximately 0.0144% per day. This is a critical premise: if you’re considering buying, you must fully understand the mechanics behind this model. 2. The rise of quantum narratives—amidst $STRK’s strong price performance, the market is now seeking additional quantum-resistant assets. 3. Although Safetrade offers a quantus:native trading pair, liquidity is insufficient. Currently, Near Intents is the only viable entry point for meaningful capital inflows and outflows. Quantus and Near have collaborated on quantum-resistant technology; we can now log into Near Intents (Near’s sole quantum-resistant signature tool) via the Quantus wallet. Their partnership is therefore very tight—Quantus and Near co-hosted an event called “Quantum & Privacy Day” in 2049. In my view, Near needs a new token to drive growth—a token unavailable elsewhere—that can serve as an exchange-like entry point through its Intents product to attract new users. 4. The communities that previously followed and promoted ZEC heavily overlap with those driving Quantus. Quantus appears to be ZEC’s successor. Much of crypto’s activity revolves around炒作 assets based on market attention—and those who control narrative power need to create new stories, new assets, and new hype after ZEC. DYOR