Everyone is racing to give AI agents wallets. Give them identity. Let them communicate. Let them move money. Cool. Now give two agents $100,000, let them make a deal, and have one claim the other didn’t deliver. Suddenly the interesting question isn’t how they transact. It’s who decides what actually happened. That’s the piece of the agent economy I think people are underestimating. If AI agents are really going to move $9T between themselves, disagreement isn’t some edge case. At that scale, it becomes infrastructure. And that’s where @GenLayer fits: giving autonomous agents somewhere to settle disputes when code alone can’t determine who is right. Everyone is preparing agents to do business. Read this thread and tell me this: who are you trusting to judge the first billion-dollar disagreement between two AI agents?