
I think it’s morally acceptable for a decentralized, permissionless cross-chain project to flag certain highly suspicious money laundering activities—but implicitly, a significant portion of blockchain’s use cases is money laundering! Tagging money laundering addresses negatively impacts the project’s token valuation @near_intents. Didn’t $ZEC’s price surge rely on its emphasis on anonymity? If the $ZEC team could also flag illegal addresses, would it still be worth $1,600?
