Recently, several controversies involving Luo Yonghao, Xibei, and Ye Ren Xiansheng have been brought together under the same public discourse. After reorganizing the timelines of these events, it becomes clear that what’s truly worth discussing is no longer just a single evaluation—but a more intriguing question: Professor Luo has always expected others to respond directly to his criticisms—so when the tables are turned and the same scrutiny is applied to him, will he respond? It all began with last year’s Xibei controversy. In September 2025, @luoyonghao published a public post after dining at Xibei, questioning the restaurant’s heavy reliance on pre-prepared and pre-processed foods, criticizing its high prices, and calling for clearer labeling of ready-made meals in the food industry. Xibei’s founder, Jia Guolong, responded directly: he denied Luo’s definition of “pre-prepared food,” at one point threatening legal action, and even opened its kitchen to public inspection. What began as a simple consumer review quickly escalated into a multi-day public debate. The back-and-forth expanded far beyond whether Xibei used pre-prepared ingredients—it evolved into broader discussions about industry standards, consumer rights to information, corporate PR, and the influence of public figures. By September 15, Xibei issued a public apology and announced adjustments to certain dish preparation processes; Luo subsequently stated he would not pursue further action, and the controversy temporarily subsided. But the matter was never fully resolved. In the months that followed, Luo repeatedly called on individuals connected to Xibei and Huayu Hua to clarify their statements publicly and even demanded that Hua Shan issue a formal apology for claims that “Xibei had been manipulated.” Thus, most people are familiar with Professor Luo’s style: If there’s an issue, lay it out. If there’s criticism, speak openly. And if someone makes a statement involving you—expect a direct response. Then came this year’s September. On September 12, Luo turned his attention to the recently popular ice cream brand “Ye Ren Xiansheng.” After eating at an airport outlet, he publicly commented: “Average at best—considering the price, it’s downright bad.” Even more interestingly, he added a follow-up note emphasizing that this was merely a normal consumer opinion and warning: “Please don’t provoke me.” Anyone familiar with last year’s Xibei drama likely had the same immediate thought: Is this going to happen again? But this time, Ye Ren Xiansheng responded very differently. On September 16, the brand issued a single, restrained statement: they would carefully consider all customer feedback and strive to improve their products. They did not mention Luo by name. They did not engage directly. And here lies the real intrigue. Last year: Luo criticized Xibei—and Xibei fought back head-on. This year: Luo criticized Ye Ren Xiansheng—and Ye Ren Xiansheng refused to engage. Meanwhile, old debates about Xibei have resurfaced in public discourse, with renewed claims circulating—and Luo himself has already publicly responded to some of them. After this full circle, some have now turned the question back onto Luo himself. @ForesoGlobal has launched a highly discussed prediction: “Will Luo Yonghao issue a public apology regarding the Xibei and Ye Ren Xiansheng incidents before the end of 2026?” What makes this prediction compelling isn’t about prematurely declaring who’s right or wrong. Luo could reasonably argue that he was simply exercising his right as a consumer to publicly evaluate a product. Others could equally argue that a public figure with massive reach and influence wields far greater power than an ordinary consumer when criticizing a company. Both questions are worth examining. But what’s dramatically compelling is this: For years, Professor Luo has been the one to bring issues into the open and demand direct responses from others. Now, the issue has been turned back onto him. Since Luo has always welcomed open debate and insisted others respond directly to his critiques—why not now ask: Will he respond directly this time? Will he explain his position? Will he stand firm that he owes no apology? Or will events unfold further—and will he ultimately issue a public apology? No one knows yet. And that’s precisely what makes prediction markets so fascinating. It’s not about being a Monday-morning quarterback after the fact—it’s about placing your judgment *before* the outcome is known. YES or NO? Instead of arguing endlessly in the comments section, why not go to Foreso and express your view through probability? Foreso direct link: https://t.co/vCDPidQbj6 Foreso original tweet: https://t.co/XqVWjMsMeg @luoyonghao、@ForesoGlobal、@zengying1107、@wuyuesanren、@lixinbao_X、@giantcutie666、@Xiaoniu6161、@maoshen #LuoYonghao #Foreso