What makes a Prediction Market trustworthy on Rialo? @RialoHQ @RialoKorea A Prediction Market isn't trustworthy simply because the trades happen onchain. The real question is what happens when the market needs to determine its final outcome. Rialo's structure separates the process into different stages, each with a specific role. Trading is where participants express their expectations through market activity. The Oracle connects the market to external information when the underlying real-world event needs to be determined. Then comes Verification. Its role is to check the integrity of the relevant information rather than deciding what the market outcome should be. Resolution comes next. It applies the predefined conditions of the market to the verified information and determines the outcome. After that, Finality establishes the resolved result as the definitive market state. Only then can Settlement process the finalized outcome. So the trust structure can be viewed as: External data → Oracle → Verification → Resolution → Finality → Settlement The important part is the separation of responsibilities. The Oracle doesn't determine the price. Verification doesn't decide the outcome. Resolution doesn't replace the verification process. And Settlement doesn't determine what happened. Each stage takes the output of the previous stage and moves the market toward a final, executable state. This is particularly relevant to Rialo's broader approach to real-world assets and programmable financial markets. A Prediction Market can depend on events that happen outside the blockchain, so the system needs a reliable way to connect real-world information with an onchain result. That's where the foundation of trust comes from: verifiable information, predefined rules, separated responsibilities, and a final state that can be settled. For Rialo, Prediction Market trust isn't based on one component. It's built into the entire path from information to final outcome.