"Inflate our way out" — why the phrase misleads You can only get rid of debt by paying it off or defaulting. But X has it figured out: raise inflation and the debt dissolves. The phrase isn't wrong. It's incomplete. What you can change is the ratio Debt-to-GDP falls when nominal growth outpaces the average rate on the debt. Inflation raises the denominator — but it also pushes rates up, and the effect cancels. You need the effective rate across the whole debt stock to lag nominal growth. Δd ≈ (i − g) / (1 + g) · dₜ₋₁ − pb i — effective nominal rate g — nominal GDP growth d — debt-to-GDP (subscript t−1 = previous period) pb — primary balance That last term is the one most often left out. Large primary deficits eat a favourable gap between i and g. Who pays Nominal growth is inflation plus real growth — so i < g can be produced two ways. 3% inflation, 2% real growth, a 4% rate: the ratio falls and the creditor still earns a real one percent. Nobody pays. Now 8% inflation, no real growth, a 3% rate: the ratio falls again, but the creditor loses five percent a year. A falling ratio doesn't mean someone is paying. The transfer appears only when the rate lags inflation itself. Real growth is the best route, the only one that hurts nobody — but it can't be produced by decision. That leaves two that can. Route 1: Surprise Inflation lifts rates only on new borrowing, not on coupons already fixed. Unexpected inflation therefore erodes the debt with no repression at all — until that debt rolls over. Average maturity sets the clock. 2021–23 showed it: debt-to-GDP fell across many countries because inflation arrived faster than it fed through into the average rate. This is what people mean by "inflate our way out." Real, but a one-off. Once the debt rolls, the creditor demands the premium and the lever is gone. Route 2: Repression Here the point isn't to catch the creditor off guard — it's to make the negative real yield something they can't refuse. Rate ceilings, capital controls, forced holdings by banks and pension funds, yield curve control. From 1946 to 1951 the Fed held the long end at 2.5% while inflation ran into double digits. Bondholders lost roughly 10% a year and could do nothing: capital had nowhere to go. US debt fell from 106% of GDP to a quarter of that by the 1970s. Reinhart and Sbrancia put the liquidation effect at 3 to 4% of GDP a year. Unlike surprise, repression repeats. It lowers the cost of every new issue, over and over. Both routes fail if the debt is indexed, foreign-currency or short-dated, or if creditors are mobile foreigners who can simply leave. And both stop working once the market demands a risk premium above inflation — the real yield turns positive and the transfer ends. The point Surprise expires with the maturity of the debt. What works long-term is repression. So the accurate phrase would be "repress our way out." Nobody says it — because it sounds exactly like what it is: a tax on bonds, deposits and pension savings. The state doesn't settle the bill. The creditor does, and never gets a say in it. #inflation #debt Also read here: https://t.co/aG7FAipOIs