The most interesting part of Stonk vs Pons is what happens after you trade. Stonk routes a share of v3 pool fees into buying and burning its top 10 ecosystem tokens. That gives leading launches a source of demand funded by activity across the platform. Pons however shares fees with creators. The potential advantage is recurring income that teams can put toward development, distribution, and keeping their communities active. Stonk collects a direct 1% platform fee on launch-curve trades, while Pons collects 30% of standard trading fees. For ex: On $1M of trading volume, Stonk’s curve fee generates $10,000. A Pons V2 pool charging a hypothetical 1% trading fee with a 30% protocol share would generate $3,000. So with much less volume, Stonk can generate competing revenues to Pons, as shown below. For those asking "why is Stonk valued so high?", well this is why.