Posts
avatar

The amount of vulnerability reports we get has also followed a similar graph over the same time period, it’s been hard to deal with. Lots of duplicate won’t-fix type issues (yes you can read our public APIs, that’s what they are for) but many valid modest issues that we’ve addressed and paid out for. Almost all of Ethereum’s $100b of active stake has at least one single point of failure that could leak its keys and get it slashed. Bad OpSec, bad supply chains, high exposure to particular software, operating systems, CPUs, and more could lead delegators who trust solo setups to up to 100% loss of their principal. We’re going to help simplify and highlight these single points of failure in a new initiative aimed at improving Ethereum’s security and its stakers’ ETH safety. If successful, most organisations will move from single point of failure setups to staking systems without a single point of failure, such as multi-operator distributed validator setups. This will better secure their stakers’ funds and ensure Ethereum never goes offline.

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It may include third-party insights, sponsored content, or promotional material for which the creator may receive compensation. Nothing in this feed constitutes investment advice or a guarantee of returns. You are solely responsible for your own investment decisions. Always conduct your own research and exercise caution before trading. We do not guarantee the accuracy of third-party information and are not liable for any losses incurred. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please refer to our Community Terms and Risk Disclosure Statement for details.

avatarPost your reply

Comment