Posts
avatar

Introducing hash-based signatures into Bitcoin will meaningfully increase signature sizes — and reduce throughput, assuming no changes to block size. "I don't think we can only migrate to hash-based signatures without changing anything else. The size of the block might need to be changed," says @Ledger CTO @P3b7_ In the interview, he adds there may be alternative ways to manage signature size — e.g. using zero-knowledge proofs for signature compression —  but notes that this option would reduce security versus using a more efficient PQ signature scheme in the first place.

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It may include third-party insights, sponsored content, or promotional material for which the creator may receive compensation. Nothing in this feed constitutes investment advice or a guarantee of returns. You are solely responsible for your own investment decisions. Always conduct your own research and exercise caution before trading. We do not guarantee the accuracy of third-party information and are not liable for any losses incurred. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please refer to our Community Terms and Risk Disclosure Statement for details.

avatarPost your reply

Comment