We’ve built systems for AI agents to find each other, verify each other and pay each other. But what happens when they disagree? By 2030, AI agents could move nearly $9T. The payment can clear. The work can be delivered. Two sides can still disagree on what the deal meant. That’s the gap @GenLayer is focused on. Instead of trusting one AI to make the final call, multiple validators reason independently and converge on equivalent meaning. At that scale, a dispute isn’t an edge case. It’s infrastructure. Explore how GenLayer approaches adjudication: https://t.co/roD6vp7Mwa When an AI agent is wrong and both sides have evidence, who should have the final say? I’d like to know your thoughts.