Posts
avatar

"Meta is a threat to Neoclouds" narrative doesn't make sense. Morgan Stanley estimated that if Meta leased out just 250 megawatts of capacity to third parties at $40 per megawatt, it would generate roughly $3 in EPS upside by 2028, an 8% earnings boost. Scale to 1,000 megawatts and you're looking at $12 additional EPS. Here's the kicker: The cost to build a gigawatt of AI compute doubled from $50 billion to $100 billion in just three to four months. Meta locked in capacity last year before the price spike so nobody else can afford to compete anymore. That timing is the entire thesis. Any new entrant trying to build comparable capacity today faces a $100 billion price tag just to get in the door. That effectively locks out new competition and hands the biggest structural advantage to whoever already has capacity like $NBIS and $CRWV. Bullish on Nebius and the established Neoclouds as the barrier to entry compounds against anyone still trying to build from scratch.

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It may include third-party insights, sponsored content, or promotional material for which the creator may receive compensation. Nothing in this feed constitutes investment advice or a guarantee of returns. You are solely responsible for your own investment decisions. Always conduct your own research and exercise caution before trading. We do not guarantee the accuracy of third-party information and are not liable for any losses incurred. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please refer to our Community Terms and Risk Disclosure Statement for details.

avatarPost your reply

Comment