ZetaChain migrates to Solana

ZetaChain community passed Proposal 68 to shut down ZetaChain L1, migrate ZETA token and Anuma AI to Solana. Anuma has 305,881 registered users.

avatar

$MU

MU recorded a short liquidation near $1,008.09, indicating aggressive short positioning was forced out around this level. The broader semiconductor tape has also recently shown renewed strength, with Micron among the chip names participating in the rebound.


Entry Zone: $998–$1,010

Support: $980 / $950

Resistance: $1,030 / $1,070


TP1: $1,030

TP2: $1,070

TP3: $1,110


Stop-Loss: $970


My Take: Holding above $1,000 keeps the short-term structure constructive. A clean breakout above $1,030 would provide stronger confirmation for continuation.


Invalidation: A sustained move below $970 cancels the long setup. Use disciplined position sizing because MU can move sharply.


$MU


#Wall Street Sees $1 Trillion in T-Bill Issuance

# ZetaChain Approves L1 Shutdown: ZETA Token Will Convert 1:1 to Solana SPL

#ZetaChain migrates to Solana

#Fed rate hike impact

avatar

Solana just deployed Alpenglow on its second public testnet. The network's biggest consensus overhaul since launch is now live in testing. The target: 100–150ms finality. Down from 12.8 seconds today. • Current finality: 12.8s (TowerBFT) • Alpenglow target: 100–150ms (Votor) • Improvement: ~100x faster • Testnet activation: Sept 24 (slot 444,625,255) • Devnet activation: Sept 25 (slot 504,148,999) • Testnet performance: >25,000 TPS at 150ms finality (Ilan Gitter) • Mainnet date: Not confirmed Here's the nuance most headlines will skip. Alpenglow doesn't touch the SVM, transaction format, or fees. Wallet users don't need to migrate anything. Applications keep processing transactions as they do now. The change is entirely underneath — replacing TowerBFT's onchain voting with Votor's offchain BLS certificate aggregation. ‌‌ The catch: Firedancer and Frankendancer haven't implemented Votor yet. The first mainnet migration depends entirely on Agave 4.3. That's a single-client dependency risk on the biggest consensus change in Solana's history. ‌ If Alpenglow's 150ms finality is a simulation target, not a live-market result, does that change the institutional settlement thesis?

avatar

$PONS is in an interesting spot here... While they have without a doubt had an incredibly successful 2 months the real test comes now. This is the first time since RHC took the challenge to Solana where they are being tested. Volumes are down significantly across the board and Ethereum has flipped RH in DEX volume. The next leg for RHC activity is what will cement them as one of the dominant chains over the next 12 months. For a launchpad on a new chain, the first $1M+ revenue day is the easy part. The second round of $1M+ revenue days will finally put the question of "how sustainable is $PONS revenue" to bed. It will require some patience, but I have 0 doubt that it will come.

avatar

Creating a coin on Solana is difficult, especially if you don't know how to create volume bots. Narrative is 🔥, but ppl want the volume unfortunately

avatar

remember when robinhood chain was going to KILL solana? the entire timeline was screaming for blood solana has memes, and the best venue to trade them, but that was never the whole chain > defi, rwas, payments, ai, stablecoins, consumer apps ct basically needs a new chain to crown every few months. don't get baited.

avatar

HIP-3 @tradexyz just got its 11th ticker, which earned them over $1 million. And these tickers also contributed the same amount to the Assistance Fund. Among all these pairs, two do not have growth mode enabled: solana:GoLDppdjB1vDTPSGxyMJFqdnj134yH6Prg9eqsGDiw6A and $MSTR

avatar

Dogwifhat is not a fundamentals story. It is a sentiment and momentum story. That makes $WIF useful for tracking speculative appetite across the Solana ecosystem. After an extreme decline, price is finally showing early signs of stabilization. If risk appetite returns, this is one meme-coin chart worth watching closely. Watch momentum, stay patient

avatar

Solana’s stablecoin supply surges to $17.3 billion, but liquidity depth matters more than minting. On September 25, Solana officially disclosed that on-chain stablecoin supply reached $17.3 billion, a new all-time high. ① The growth in supply indicates that issuers, market makers, and applications are willing to allocate more USD liquidity to Solana. ② However, minting does not equal payments, nor does it mean funds have entered DeFi or real-world commerce settlements. ③ It’s equally important to monitor active stablecoin addresses, transaction volumes, DEX liquidity depth, lending utilization rates, and redemption activity. ④ Large-scale minting in the short term may simply reflect cross-chain rebalancing or institutional inventory management. My view: $17.3 billion is a better indicator of financial infrastructure value than daily TPS—but the next step is proving these dollars aren’t just “parked” on-chain, but actively circulating in payments, trading, credit, and asset settlement. @Solana_zh @solana @Circle @Tether_to